[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Hot turning in a quattro - T*rsen content warning
After reading through the archives, both Jeff G and Brendan R comments
regarding corner entry and skid correction really gets interesting when you
read it wrt torsen center diff. For discussion let's look at an "overcooked"
torsen turn on water/snow/ice (read: low cf).
Power up after corner entry, Torsen shifts power to the rear, overloading the
rears ability to grip, car is now at 90 degrees to the apex, what to do?
Scenario 1) add opposite lock, throttle on (not wot). Interesting problem.
One can presume you weren't at full lock going into the turn, so in order for
*more* Tshift rear to NOT occur, your opposite lock would have to be *less
than or equal to the steering angle going into the turn to begin with*.
Remember, if a torsen is fooled by slip angle differences, that also applies
to the equal opposite lock slide. So one could conclude that the same
relative slip angle <torsen fooled> applies to both turn in slip angle and
it's corresponding opposite lock during a slide. Don't forget too, that as
you start to add opposite lock, you go from O, then U - wheels straight
ahead, then O wheels opposite lock. Get it exactly right, the second O is
the same Bias Ratio as your turn in.
I argue that dance is almost impossible to do (read: more luck than skill).
I also argue that opposite lock during a slide varies with the slide (armco,
ditch, turn out, etc.). So, on top of the oh sh*t factor, you have a device
that is constantly varying torque based on your relative slip angle, and the
device could care less that you are sliding 90 degrees to the apex. An
absolute traction device isn't what you need here.
Scenario 2) accelerate, both wheels ahead. BTST (x a dozen or so, thanks
valerie:) at Steamboat, maximum traction, no slip angle differences, car
ditches into the apex. (Graydon Stuckey gets credit for this summary, a
hummv doesn't care what's at the apex). Fine for Steamboat and for forgiving
tracks. However, a A4t at Road America found little protection on the walls
in this manuever. Few tracks figure on scenario 2, pea gravel on the apex?
Scenario 3) Lift. Nope, don't do it, spin guaranteed (Dave has a white
paper that spells this out). Remember, you have a rear bias oversteer on
throttle slide, a rwd biased oversteer. Problem, as soon as you lift, torque
decreases toward zero, car goes back to Understeering fwd chassis. 1 of 2
things happen: LTO = spin or LTU = more slide. Which dictates one or the
other? Depends on what kind of steering input you give and how much front
end loading occurs. No countersteer and/or with front weight shift, gives
LTO, countersteer gives you LTU. My personal experience is extensively with
the latter. My summation is: LTU off throttle during a slide gives little
control, and time/distance becomes your biggest enemy to staying "passive".
Racer rule of thumb while turning: If you are steering only, you are really
only praying, too true.
Scenario 4) WOT, with steering. Result: with luck and enough room you
might be able to pull it out. However, opposite lock skidding technique
would dictate, that you are in a delicate dance. Too much opposite lock
(more than your initial turn in steering) gives *more* torque rear (which
means that the throttle needs to come up a bit with "increased" opposite
lock). Remember too, that when wheels are spinning on the same cf, the
torsen is confused, and immediately sends the torque transfer into an
infinite loop (slip angle differences have less effect on the torque
transfer, cuz a torsen, being a 'traction' device, the traction issue is
simpler for the torsen. Or put another way, traction with four wheels on the
same cf gives bigger and maximum Tshift, slip angle differences can make the
torsen Tshift max, but won't necessarily). Watching this at RA was kinda
cool, fronts spin then backs then fronts, all in 5-7seconds of a turn.
Bottom Line: None of the above give you that "quattro advantage" feeling.
Neat toy.
Scott Justusson