Re: RE:Re: The final alignment post for now - request for Phil

["Stephen Bigelow" <sbigelow@sprint.ca>]

-----Original Message-----
From: QSHIPQ@aol.com <QSHIPQ@aol.com>



>Steve Bigelow writes:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: QSHIPQ@aol.com <QSHIPQ@aol.com>
>>PHIL PAYNE;
>>Please post up your mechanics' alignment specifications for both the URQ
>>and
>
>>>http://www.audifans.com/cgi-bin/lwgate/QUATTRO/archives/quattro.991013/Au
tho
>>>r/article-23.html
>
>Steve a couple of thoughts, but thanks for the direction.  1) would you
>please take a look at the above, and edit it again, wingate won't let you
in
>that way (but anyone can find it in the archives under "URQ alignment
data -
>Phil Payne").  2)  No address for the 44 chassis car specifications.  3)
If
>you read my post, I asked for the mechanics "exact" specifications used;
4)



Scott a couple of thoughts, but...1) You want me to edit what? For who?  I
can get there just fine, and would imagine most listers, if not able to go
directly, can surely cut and paste. 2) Well aware, thanks, obvious to most.
3) Your post is right above...and is clear what you wanted, and it is
provided. The Bentley specs are what are used.

If you need some help understanding this, I'll be glad to help. No white
paper required.

Something else needs an alignment, though.