re: Alignment specs - not

[QSHIPQ@aol.com]

Steve writes:
> 2) Well aware, thanks, obvious to most.
>3) Your post is right above...and is clear what you wanted, and it is
>provided. The Bentley specs are what are used.
>If you need some help understanding this, I'll be glad to help. No white
>paper required.Something else needs an alignment, though.

A waste of time, irrelevent.  Phil indicated how "good" BRM was, and that he 
gets "exact" specifications where possible.  Peaked, I asked for those 
exactly (I want to be "better" too, especially if I can learn alignment 
numbers that 'cure' spider bites = the CLAIM).  After *all* the fog, I get 
Bentley references, which I routinely use on every chasis alignment?  And 
your post?  I was hoping for something more specific.  

Thanks for your efforts at...  Directing me to a Bentley site which exactly 
doesn't answer the questions asked.

Happy to drop it, Phil seems to have.  Maybe Dave E. can put his quiz answers 
up next.  Alignments>spider bite cure isn't correlated or supported by *any* 
data, Phil's claims included.  EOD.

Scott Justusson