RE: A sobering thought

["Ken Keith" <auditude@neta.com>]

"Buchholz, Steven" <Steven.Buchholz@kla-tencor.com> wrote:
> 
> The other interesting occurrence here in California is that the CHP used the
> argument that it is difficult to catch truckers with their radios to have
> unmarked cars approved.  In typical form, they appeased the rest of the
> public by saying that such cars are used only to catch truckers.  Well, now
> that they have them they are finding that they work just fine for catching
> cars too ... and now the CHP has taken the final plunge, the big news here
> is the use of RADAR to catch "aggressive drivers" ...

The Peoples Republik of Kalifornia is striving to be a U.S. leader in 
the race to strip away freedom and empower the government at the 
expense of it's subjects.
 
> ... the good news here though is that California's governor has decided not
> to appeal the ruling that California's $300 Smog Impact Fee was illegal ...

I found that as surprising as the change to exempt pre-'74 cars 
from a smog check requirement.

Ken