Re: other list archives

["Lawson, Dave" <dlawson@ball.com>]

Stephen writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> That would be a _much_ better solution than what is now being 
>> implemented,
>> i.e. one persons locked, biased, and probably unwanted summation.

I don't see why Stephen sees the continual need to give his
personal comentary. If he doesn't like what he reads delete it,
and stop responding with his own personal summations. 

And Steve adds:

> ... I used to know of such a place, sometimes I wonder where it's gone ...

I have also seen a change over the past year or 2. It appears now that
if you enter into any enginering type discussion which takes more than 
2 posts to solve, a few voices rise up and say shut up and get out. I could 
care less about FWD auto tranny problems, audis in the latest movies,
or painting engine sheetmetal yellow, but do *I* come in telling anyone
what subjects are *correct* for discussion? No, they have every right to
discuss the finer details of preparing metal surfaces for applying powder
in an electric field. That same leeway needs to be applied to all topics
of discussion.

FWIW
-
Dave Lawson