[200q20v] source for header for NA I5?
Fundsalo Racing
fundsaloracing at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 12 06:48:36 EDT 2001
The last (some?) of the Coupe GTs here in the US got
the 130/136/137HP (depending who you ask) engine with
higher compression, piston squirters, better oil-pan
baffling, etc. Not a direct comparison with the older
Coupe GTs and the 4KQs of US-spec.
-glen
OOOO
--- C1J1Miller at aol.com wrote:
> The 87.5 coupe was sold here as the "last" coupe in
> USA until the '90/91 new body style car; don't know
> what happened overseas.
>
> Keep in mind we're usually a year or two late on
> what we get; the new body style 4000 (read our '88
> on 80/90) was out with the 130 hp engine/ CIS-EIII
> everywhere else, so it really was Audi not upgrading
> the last of the 4kq's...
> Chris
>
> In a message dated Thu, 12 Apr 2001 8:40:44 AM
> Eastern Daylight Time, Chris Covington
> <malth at umich.edu> writes:
>
> << But didn't the 87.5 Coupe GT have more power than
> any other 4KQ EVER
> (130hp?)? And I'm sure with more power and less
> weight, it was faster.
> I'm not so sure that the 4KQ was 'supposed' to be
> just as fast as the
> Coupe GT.
>
> Chris
> '91 2cq
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Fundsalo Racing wrote:
>
> > I think one reason it is so difficult to improve
> on is
> > that Audi required the 4KQ to be just as fast or
> > faster Vs the Coupe GT of the same vintage for
> > marketing reasons. They designed a special 2-piece
> > cast/tubular heaser system and a very good exhaust
> > system to get 5+ HP more from the otherwise
> identical
> > engine in the Coupe GT to overcome the additional
> > weight of the AWD and keep the 4KQ as fast or
> faster
> > Vs the Coupe GT of the day. They put a lot of
> extra
> > development work and expense into the 4KQ exaust
> for
> > this reason.
> >
> > -glen
> >
> > OOOO
> >
> > --- Linus Toy <linust at mindspring.com> wrote:
> > > At 04:45 AM 4/11/2001 -0700, Fundsalo Racing
> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Do you have information to the effect that the
> 4KQ
> > > 85
> > > > > 87 systems is any better Vs the 4KQ 84
> system? I
> > > had
> > > >thought they were identical, cast 5-into-3 EM
> bolts
> > > to
> > > >head and tubular 3-into-1 bolts to EM. It is a
> very
> > > >nice factory system, takes advantage of the
> > > >5-into-3-into-1 design and is quiet and
> > > long-lasting
> > > >due to the cast EM at the head Vs 100% tubular.
> > > >Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >-glen
> > >
> > > Sorry, no. you might check the family album to
> see
> > > if the p/n are the same
> > > or different.
> > > Related thought: I once spoke with a tech at
> Borla,
> > > inquiring about
> > > systems for the 4kcsq. This was back in the
> late
> > > 80s when they were still
> > > new, but few exhaust systems needed replacement
> > > then, so very limited
> > > market. At any rate, his comment was that they
> were
> > > having (then) a tough
> > > time improving on the factory system.
> Interesting.
> > >
> > > --Linus
> > >
> >
>
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> > > * Linus Toy Insanity is
> doing
> > > the same thing *
> > > * Mercer Island, WA you've always
> done
> > > and expecting *
> > > * linust at mindspring.com different
> results
> > > *
> > > * - Roger
> > > Milliken *
> > >
> >
>
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > 200q20v mailing list
> > 200q20v at audifans.com
> > http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> 200q20v mailing list
> 200q20v at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v
> >>
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
More information about the 200q20v
mailing list