ATF versus G60 versus Brembo piston sizes.

Bernie Benz b.benz at charter.net
Sun Sep 14 20:33:00 PDT 2008


I have measured and compared the CSAs of both systems. They are  
identical.

You can have either of the two backing plate styles refilled with the  
material of your chioce. So, what’s yout bitch?

Bernie


On Sep 14, 2008, at 7:26 PM, YBK wrote:

> I am not interested in UFO braking ability whatsoever.  I was only  
> asking about cylinder diameter.
>
> But speaking of braking ability there are no racing pads available  
> for UFO and only limited selection for G60. Any better then average  
> G60 pad will provide more friction then UFOs 15% or so bigger disk.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Mike Miller" <mikemilr at blackfoot.net>
> Date: Sunday, Sep 14, 2008 8:48 pm
> Subject: Re: ATF versus G60 versus Brembo piston sizes.
> To: "YBK" <ybk at dongames.net>,	<200q20v at audifans.com>
>
> I've put a couple hundred thousand miles on different 200q's with  
> UFO and G60's over the last 12 years. IMO, the UFOs have far better  
> braking ability.
>
> mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: YBK
> To: 200q20v at audifans.com
> Sent: Sunday, September 14, 2008 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: ATF versus G60 versus Brembo piston sizes.
>
> I've heard many times that effective area is the same but I am  
> unable to find actual ATE piston diameter to verify the statement.
>
> Recently somebody described here that after ATE -> G60 swap the  
> brake pedal travel increased. It means that ATE (UFO) effective  
> piston area is smaller.
> _______________________________________________
> 200q20v mailing list	 http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v
>
> _______________________________________________
> 200q20v mailing list	 http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v



More information about the 200q20v mailing list