Camber

[Jay Kempf]

Those are the only "camber" adjusters I know of on the front. I guess I am
just being fiddly because it was within spec technically. I love specs like
.5 +- .5 because it is a number +- 100% deviation. I guess being a design
engineer gives you some skewed views of engineering specifications. To me
that looks like the distance to the sun +- the distance to the sun. What was
the point of having a nominal to begin with :) 

Just shifted the subframe. So we'll see. I actually have turn plates,
lasers, digital levels, all fit out custom to go on wheels. I also have
wheel center fixtures to measure toe front to rear for thrust line
adjustment. Developed the tools for aligning my hot rod (928).

>From what I have seen the 200 doesn't give the kinds of fits and benefits
from dialing the alignment to some magic concoction of angles like the 928
does. In fact my A6 is the same way. Doesn't chew tires no matter what I do
to it. Handles great no matter what I do to it. The 928 drives great but you
can get it to drive amazing if you do a bunch of experimenting with
tire/wheel/alignment combinations. Of course I haven't beaten any of my
quattros the way I have beaten my 928.  




jfk


-------------------------
Jay Kempf
jkempf at madriver.com
802 272 5868 
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernie Benz [mailto:b.benz at charter.net] 
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 9:48 AM
To: jkempf at madriver.com
Cc: 200q20v at audifans.com
Subject: Re: Camber

What are the "adjusters" you talk about, strut top in the towers?