[A4] Re: Quattro, Torsen, Haldex and others...
Rocky Mullin
caliban at sharon.net
Tue Dec 28 13:48:58 EST 2004
interestingly, i'm seriously considering an X3.
At 8:29 AM -0800 12/28/04, Brian J White wrote:
>"quattro IV - torsen center diff with open front and rear diffs, but now it
>has EDL to keep side-to-side traction in check. This system combines the
>proactive nature of the mechanical torsen, with reactive aspect of
>the EDL. It
>should in theory able to pass the "one wheel with traction only" test."
>
>Key point up there. The car on which I saw the test applied was a
>99 or so A4 Quattro...obviously having Quattro IV.
>Either they disabled the EDL (possible as this was a marketing
>exercise) or the EDL couldn't keep up with absolutely ZERO traction
>on the other 4 wheels. It certainly looked like it was trying but
>just couldn't make it happen. My eyes popped out of my head....I
>was certainly surprised to say the least.
>
>The BMW (the new system) AWD on the 330Xi certainly did the trick.
>There are handling advantages to the 36/66 torque split as well.
>Biased towards the rear for that rear wheel drive track handling
>feel.
>
>
>At 08:07 2004-12-28, Brizax at aol.com wrote:
>>
>>GOOD INFO THERE, SOMEONE HAS BEEN PAYING ATTENTION IN CLASS THE LAST COUPLE
>>YEARS HUH? :)
>>
>>NYT is wrong!!!
>>
>>On torsen based quattro system (now version 4, hence quattro IV), the
>>factory torsen is a splitted 2:1, meaning it can transfer up to 2/3
>>of available
>>power to either the front or rear axle. I've read many different
>>torque split
>>figures from different sources, ranging from 40:60 to 30:70, but I believe
>>the 2/3 is the most correct. There're other versions of torsen
>>available, for
>>example Stasis Engineering offers a 4:1 version, capable of splitting up to
>>4/5th (or 80%) to either end.
>>
>>All torsen are normally 50:50, whereas the haldex quattro is either 100:0 pr
>>95:5 normally, and it's capable of sending all power to either end. Volvo
>>uses this system as well. So there, NYT got the 2 quattros confused.
>>
>>Now here's some distinction of the different versions of traditional quattro
>>systems for longitudinally mounted engines (all B and C chassis cars, such
>>as 4000, 80/90, 5000, 100/200, A4, A6, A8):
>>
>>quattro I - original version. All 3 diffs are open, but the center and rear
>>are manually lockable. It's very simple and reliable, but it tends to eat
>>tires or cause damage to the driveline when people forget to unlock the diffs
>>after they unstuck themselves.
>>
>>quattro II - introduced in '88 I believe, when torsen replaced the old open
>>center diff. The rear is still manually lockable, but it's now operated
>>pneumatically so that it'll unlock itself once the car reaches
>>over 25 km/h. I
>>have this in my '90 CoupeQ, it works very well, never needed to
>>lock the rear
>>diff, but this version will not pass the "one wheel with traction
>>only" test.
>>
>>quattro III - this was only used in the V8, where both the center and rear
>>diffs are torsen. Since this car wasn't sold in large quantity I don't know
>>how well it actually works, but it sure sounds promising, almost like the
>>HUMVEE's system!
>>
>>quattro IV - torsen center diff with open front and rear diffs, but now it
>>has EDL to keep side-to-side traction in check. This system combines the
>>proactive nature of the mechanical torsen, with reactive aspect of
>>the EDL. It
>>should in theory able to pass the "one wheel with traction only" test.
>>
>>On the TT, its quattro system has no version because it's not an evolution
>>of the original quattro for longitudinally mounted engines. As I've said
>>before, my brief drive in a TT didn't impress me much. I think
>>it's mainly due
>>to the completely reactive nature of the haldex system, ie, it
>>sends power to
>>the rear until it detect slips. However I hear that Volvo has
>>since modified
>>their haldex AWD on newer cars and they're supposed to be a cut above the
>>original haldex system.
>>
>>To further continue the AWD topic, BMW's system is not as good as quattro
>>due to its inability of changing torque split between front and rear, it's
>>always at 38/62. However it's brand new x-drive is supposedly
>>much better than
>>the old AWD system, which started in '88 in the 325ix and was never
>>changed/upgraded until just now.
>>
>>M-B's system is even worse. All 3 diffs are open and it relies on their
>>version of EDL to control wheel spin by braking the spinning wheel(s) hence
>>sending power to the ones that aren't spinning. It's completely
>>reactive, much
>>worse than the haldex system, and it places too much demand on the
>>brakes. If
>>Audi decided to deactivate their EDLs above 80 km/h due to potentially
>>overworking the brakes, how well do you think M-B's system copes
>>with this issue?
>> Although I must say this probably won't be a problem for daily driving, it's
>> more of a problem if you really get stuck or actually to off-roading.
>>
>>
>>Now to chip in my $0.02 on the center versus rear applications of the torsen
>>diff, they are really quite different. Hence if you've only driven quattros
>>with torsen center diff, you really have no idea how it would behave when
>>is't slapped onto the rear of a RWD car, of the front of a FWD car
>>(I believe
>>Nissan used to offer torsen on their 240SX and Maxima as part of their SE
>>package). A friend of mine (240SX owner) has told me once that having a LSD
>>(such as torsen) in the rear is great in the dry, but it does do
>>some wierd stuff
>>when it's wet and slippery, cause the diff seems to be distributing power
>>from side to side as each of the rear wheels lose and regain
>>traction during a
>>turn.
>>
>>Anyhow, hope this clears things up a bit, or not... ;-)
>>
>>Quincy
>>'01.5 S4 - quattro IV
>>'90 CoupeQ - quattro II
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>A4 mailing list
>>A4 at audifans.com
>>http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/a4
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>A4 mailing list
>A4 at audifans.com
>http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/a4
--
Rocky Mullin
"Evil kills those who perpetrate it, and the pastures of inequity are harmful"
http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm
More information about the A4
mailing list