AudiWorld.com Forums + Audifans.com Forums ?!

[Jon Linkov]

As much as I agree that it is silly to combine the two, I WILL say, in
defense of people on Audiworld, that there is a LOT of knowledge
(particularly track knowledge, for example) on the site. I used to frequent
it when it was new and unique. To be honest, this site put me off for a
while when I had my new A4 (1996). As I grew more knowledgeable about Audis,
I appreciated this list more and more. Coincidentally, Audiworld grew more
juvenile.

But dismissing the entire population on that site is just as bad as
dismissing all Audifans members as "old farts who are pissed they can't
afford a new S4." Both are equally wrong and both are equally small-minded.

Just my $.02. Since I frequent the track events forums on Audiworld (the
only forum I go to there) and recieve the full Audifans list, I guess I'm
one of the few who is hated by both memberships! :-)

Jon
njconn at mail.com
'96 A4q
http://www.quattroclubusa.org/r/potomac

> -----Original Message-----
> From: quattro-admin at audifans.com [mailto:quattro-admin at audifans.com]On
> Behalf Of Mike Arman
>
>
> I agree - I think keeping them separate is very much in OUR interests.
>
> We're the "gear-heads" - we fix obscure stuff on (gasp!) old cars, get our
> hands dirty, read the parts books (!) and buy the Bentleys.
>
> Those guys are the posers - the only interest they might have in Michelle
> Mouton's personal URQ is how many watts does the radio put out.
>