Help, new wheels scraping on '85 Coupe GT addendum:
edkellock at juno.com
edkellock at juno.com
Wed Nov 29 22:44:45 EST 2000
Forgot to mention that my car is not lowered. It has the
stock original springs with Boge TurboGas.. These shocks
caused the car to sit higher, which is exactly what I was going
for in the rear. With the stock original shocks the rear end
sagged which exacerbated the wheel rub with the 205-50-15s.
I can still rub the left rear but only when I get the suspension
compressed enough which happens much less often now with
a higher static heighth and a firmer shock. The 205's are on
TSW Evo 15x7 et40. With the stock Ronal 14x6 et45 and
a 195-60 I have never experienced rubbing.
Years ago, I installed an Addco rear sway bar. This upset the
handling more than any improvement I could notice. I believe
it would have worked much better had I matched it with a thicker
front bar. In the same vein, I really enjoy the feel of the car when
I take off the TSWs with 205s and go back to the smaller, lighter
stock wheels and tires. Go figure.
Ed
Colorado Springs, CO
On Wed, 29 Nov 2000 17:29:53 -0800 "Fisher, Scott"
<Scott_Fisher at intuit.com> writes:
>
> Also, to chime in further on the subject of tweaking ride height with
> shocks: some brands of shock *are* known to change a car's ride height.
> This was well documented in the early '90s about Tokico Illuminas; I
ran a
> set on my autocross GTI and the car was slightly taller than a friend
and
> codriver's GTI with Boge shocks. Both cars were on stock springs and
the
> same tires/wheels, so the only difference was the shock choice. The
main
> advantage that the Illuminas gave, however, was that I could tune the
rears
> stiffer than the fronts, which changed the car's corner-entry
> characteristics to make it feel as though it had more (or at least
some)
> oversteer in the early part of the corner. Just the change you want to
make
> in a noseheavy autocrosser, where getting the car to "point" quickly in
a
> corner is half the battle.
>
> One thing I enjoy about the CGT is that, for a FWD car, there's far
less
> understeer than I'd expect from that looooong 5-cylinder engine hanging
off
> the front. Kudos to Audi for getting the rear suspension as good as it
is;
> it's a joy to pitch this car into a corner hard, get on the gas, have
the
> weight transfer to the rear and feel the car yaw outward into something
that
> feels very much like a RWD car's drift. That's the main reason I'm not
> planning on putting in shorter springs -- since this will probably
never be
> a track car, I don't want to upset the rear-end geometry.
>
> --Scott Fisher
> 1983 CGT
> 1993 100CSQ
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
More information about the quattro
mailing list