[urq] Re: Audi Ur-Q vs. Mustang 308

[c a l i b a n]

	i smoked a 5.0 'stang in a stoplight dragrace in mike's
	urq.  every time he shifted, he chirped; every time i shifted,
	i lunged forward.  anyway, maybe he just sucked as a driver.
	mike's urq is really nicely set up - borla, chipped mc motor,
	other stuff.  remember that night, mike?

On Sat, 2 Sep 2000 DGraber460 at aol.com wrote:

]This is maybe the 4th or 5th post I've seen about outrunning 5.0 Mustangs 
]with URQ's.
]At first I just let it go, since my URQ wasn't set up right, I had no frame 
]of reference.
]Well, I finally got mine running quite well (I think it's as good as a stock 
]URQ will run), and have the original Road & Track road test. R&T reported a 
]0-60 time for the '83 URQ of 8.2 seconds. That is a little slower than I 
]think they run, but it's close. Most stock 5.0 Mustangs will turn low 7's. 
]Built 302 stangs will get into the 6's quite easily. Make no mistake, I am 
]_not_ a dorf fan, and I _don't_ dispute your claim in any way, but I know the 
]decent condition Mustangs around here would seriously blow me off the line. 
]Thirty and up might be closer, but to 30 it wouldn't even be close.
]I have a 330HP LT4 that will handle the dorfs, but they run closer the Vette 
]then to the URQ.
]Am I missing something here. If my stock URQ will run 0-60 in the high 6s to 
]low 7s, I want to know how to do it!
]
]Dennis
]Denver
]_______________________________________________
]Audifans urq mailing list
]Send posts to: mailto:urq at audifans.com
]To manage your list connection see http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
]

-- 
 rocky mullin - chaotic good
 http://caliban.sf.ca.us/
 two strokes are faster than four!
 this message was composed using the vi editor.

 "i'm not very sharp- i just get things done"  -- steve lerner