Rather, not "like" the tors*n list, but "the" existing tors*n list. That's what it's for, I thought. I'd hate to see us make a new list for every topic! :-P (especially if they won't get used...) Ken Beatty, Robert <BeattyR at ummhc.org> wrote: > > I'm beginning to wonder if we need a separate list for manifold discussion > like the Tor*en list. Rob