2.3L NG conversion in my 84 4KQ

[JShadzi at aol.com]

The 38mm are big enough, but the 40's will swap right in with bigger seats, and the CIS-e has no trouble fueling the 2.3, if you are going to swap harnesses, you mise well do a turbo conversion.  The CIS-3 is nice, but no real advantage as far as performance is converned (considering the additional amount of work), with 92 octane pinging is not a problem either.
Javad

In a message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2001  3:04:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Michael Gough <mdg3369 at altavista.com> writes:

> >BTW-we only swapped in the bottom end, but left the JT >inductions system as is, the best way to do it I 
> >belive, no real advantage to swapping in all the NG 
> >head stuff too.
> 
> The NG has the bigger intake valves 40mm vs. 38. Is the JT head good enough? I am thinking of swapping a 2.3 into my sisters car but still deciding between the whole thing w/ CIS-EIII or just the short or long block. Anybody with any comments?
> Thanks
> Mike
> 
> 
> Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping!
> http://www.shopping.altavista.com