AoA warranty denial

Rob Andrews randrews at sbcglobal.net
Tue Nov 13 08:14:33 EST 2001


That is not the point...it's principle at this point.  AoA has screwed too
many people including myself in the past.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lundy [mailto:fast928 at prodigy.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:40 PM
> To: TM; S-Car-List; quattro at audifans.com
> Cc: Audi_80 at email.msn.com; brett at cloud9.net; ti at amb.org;
> mdg3369 at mac.com; randrews at sbcglobal.net
> Subject: Re: AoA warranty denial
>
>
> Everybody want some cheese with that whine  :-)
>
> http://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/559137.phtml
>
> Audi will cover it if he signs an affidavit....and he still
> won't sign??  I
> don't get it!!
> ---
> Andrew Lundy
> fast928 at prodigy.net
> 90 80q
> 99 A6q
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "TM" <t44tq at mindspring.com>
> To: "S-Car-List" <s-car-list at yahoogroups.com>; <quattro at audifans.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:20 PM
> Subject: AoA warranty denial
>
>
> > After being pointed to this thread:
> > http://forums.audiworld.com/s4/msgs/558961.phtml
> >
> > Reading through it, it is rather outrageous. If the facts are
> > as stated, it looks like AoA may be in for a fight on Magnusson-Moss
> > Act grounds.
> >
> > The repeated turbo failures on the 2.7T engines concern me- if
> > people are being truthful, the 2.7T engine has a large number of
> > turbo failures, it seems. Maybe it is only because of the community
> > in which this is posted that it seems that way... any thoughts?
> >
> > I'm getting more and more leery of recommending any 2.7T equipped
> > Audis even though I think it is the best engine available in the
> > current lineup, overall.
> >
> > Ti, Brad, Derek, any thoughts?
> >
> > Maybe a W8 Passat will be a better choice to replace our A4...
> >
> > Taka
> >
> >
>
>




More information about the quattro mailing list