[urq] Re: 10 vT EM? K24 is good for 278 HP

[QSHIPQ at aol.com]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
The k24 *can* produce enough air (CFM at PR+ Efficiency) to generate a sustained
270-280HP Javad.  It matters not if that air flows thru a 10vt or a 20vt
motor.  Those levels of airflow are easily attainable in either, remember
Dialynx put 400hp thru the 10vt motor.   Increases in VE are usually at a
specific RPM, usually AT the expense of less VE at other rpms.  Tying a turbo
CE to Engine VE isn't a valid connection.  Your conclusion that a k24 will
generate more hp in a 20vt motor vs a 10vt motor in terms of "absolute" hp,
is a tough argument to make.  Either motor can easily support this HP level
"in stock trim".  The k24 can supply the air to make this happen.  The k24
sport (bigger cold side) can top the 300hp level.  The limiting factor on the
WX motor is the stock CIS fuel system (hey I know this guy;), which really
tops out at about 270hp.

Scott Justusson
k24 83 urq

In a message dated 4/26/02 3:30:47 PM Central Daylight Time, JShadzi at aol.com
writes:



Right, but then you are forcing the issue of VE, which the 20v motor is much
more volumetric efficient than the 10v, I still don't think a k24 can make
280hp in a 10v (basically stock ports/cam) application regardless, especially
including the efficiency and flow lossed of the 10v head.

Javad

In a message dated Fri, 26 Apr 2002  4:22:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Fundsalo Racing <fundsaloracing at yahoo.com> writes:

>
>Yes, understood, 10v cars. I was just trying to make
>the point (not clearly I guess) that the 'little' K24
>is not going to be a limiting factor up to like
>270-280 HP.