[urq] Re: 10 vT EM? K24 is good for 278 HP

[Zsolt Kovacs]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hey guys,

Speaking of turbos/HP/fuel systems, I decided to modify my 88 Olympic
Edition 5ktq. I am going with Scott Mockry's chipped ECU and wastage
spring, and I would also like to add a different turbo (RS2?) with
modified intercooler. Possibly I would also like to modify/replace the
stock injection system.

I would appreciate all advice about alternatives, options pros/cons etc.

Thanks in Advance,
  Zsolt



Mihnea Cotet wrote:

> At 08:32 29/04/2002 -0400, QSHIPQ at aol.com wrote:
>
>> --
>> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>> The k24 *can* produce enough air (CFM at PR+ Efficiency) to generate a
>> sustained
>> 270-280HP Javad.  It matters not if that air flows thru a 10vt or a 20vt
>> motor.  Those levels of airflow are easily attainable in either,
>> remember
>> Dialynx put 400hp thru the 10vt motor.   Increases in VE are usually
>> at a
>> specific RPM, usually AT the expense of less VE at other rpms.  Tying
>> a turbo
>> CE to Engine VE isn't a valid connection.  Your conclusion that a k24
>> will
>> generate more hp in a 20vt motor vs a 10vt motor in terms of
>> "absolute" hp,
>> is a tough argument to make.  Either motor can easily support this HP
>> level
>> "in stock trim".  The k24 can supply the air to make this happen.
>> The k24
>> sport (bigger cold side) can top the 300hp level.  The limiting
>> factor on the
>> WX motor is the stock CIS fuel system (hey I know this guy;), which
>> really
>> tops out at about 270hp.
>
>
> Scott,
>
> What's a sport K24 and where could I find one out here in Europe
> (Belgium)???
>
> Thanks for your answer,
>
>
> Mihnea
>
> '85 -OOOO- Coupe quattro
>
> http://www.audifans.com/registry/view.php?action=viewCar&carid=350
>
>
>

--