entertaining a 20vt conversion
Brett Dikeman
brett at cloud9.net
Fri Feb 8 18:47:41 EST 2002
At 1:23 PM -0800 2/8/02, agaidos at got.net wrote:
> Someone locally is selling their totaled '91 200 20vt. I am, at the least,
>planning on buying some parts off it for my wife's car. However, I've since
>started contemplating the pros and cons of transplanting a 20vt motor into
>my '85 urq. Realizing I would be working on one of the rarest Audis in the US
>and may cause irreversable changes to the car hasn't gone without thought.
> Having said that I am interested in opinions concerning both technical issues
>like wiring in the newer, more complicated engine management system as well as
>purest opinions regarding modifications to an '85 urq.
My feelings on dropping the 3B into other cars are well known. I
particularly despise those that rip them out of salvageable
200q20v's, but it sounds like the donor in this case isn't. Still,
that's one less engine for a 200q20v owner who has blown theirs and
needs a replacement.
In this case, it's more of a question of destroying the value of the
UrQ(remember, it is about 3 years from being a "classic" car, a few
more and it will be an antique.)
Personally, I'd drop the engine into a 4000q(if you wanted to do
mostly track) or a 90q(if it would be the daily driver taken out on
the track once in a while), probably a 90q. The 20v becomes the
zippy "fun" car, the UrQ becomes the garage queen/show car. Let's
face it, its probably cheaper to drive the UrQ less :-)
Given that the 90q sedan weighs less than the oh-so-popular eS2
conversion, it should be even more of a blast, and your UrQ avoids
the knife and retains its value.
B
--
----
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
http://www.users.cloud9.net/~brett/
http://www.users.cloud9.net/~brett/bdikeman.asc (PGP Public Key)
More information about the quattro
mailing list