4kqt test drive?? Boston area?

[ScottyCBoy at aol.com]

Sorry my bad. I had a similar conversation with someone who swore his stock 4kq coule do 150+..

Scott

In a message dated Tue, 19 Feb 2002  3:28:35 PM Eastern Standard Time, JShadzi writes:

> Scott, thanks for joining the conversation, we are talking about turbo converted cars here.  (look over the copied posts below)
>
> ;)
>
> Javad
>
> > Top speed in a 4000 140??? I find that a bit hard to belive with the stock 115 horsepower. The urq had 170 horsepower and a top speed of 137 or something like that. Once I got my 4000Q up to 125 but that was while going down a very long hill with a tail wind.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > In a message dated Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:25:06 AM Eastern Standard Time, JShadzi at aol.com writes:
> >
> > > In a message dated 2/19/2002 1:14:25 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> > > coolian at attbi.com writes:
> > >
> > > << >the freeway, and a top speed only dictated by the revlimiter at 6500rpm in
> > >  >5th.  I've done swaps, and consulted others, that cost under $1500.
> > >
> > >  And all of the aerodynamics of a brick.
> > >  I know, I captain the red brick with the blue engine.
> > >
> > >  Brendan
> > >   >>
> > >
> > > Sure, well in a 4kq top speed in 5th isn't much more than 140mph or so, past
> > > that you would have aerodynamic problems I'm sure.  The 80/90 is much better
> > > in that regard.
> > >
> > > Javad