KKK RS2 race... now K26
Q
Q at IntendedAcceleration.com
Sun Jun 9 00:43:13 EDT 2002
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Basic generic info:
Early air cooled and water cooled K26: same configuration up to mid 1989
Beginning mid 1989 through 3B 200, RR urq, S4, and S6 the K26 was
dropped for a K24 with a larger compressor inducer, but a smaller
exducer on the compressor. The turbine had a smaller exducer.
K24 was used on the RS2 and a turbine with a larger exducer than the K24
turbos above was used, but not as big as the 5000. Compressor was a K26
using the same size exducer as the 5000/200 but an inducer larger than
the K24 above, so a lot more air capacity. More lag, but not as much as
the 5000.
Ned
-----Original Message-----
From: quattro-admin at audifans.com [mailto:quattro-admin at audifans.com] On
Behalf Of ScottyCBoy at aol.com
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 6:20 AM
To: mik at info.fundp.ac.be; Quattro at audifans.com
Subject: Re: KKK RS2 race... now K26
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
In a message dated 6/8/2002 5:58:16 AM Central Daylight Time,
mik at info.fundp.ac.be writes:
> Well, I've followed your discussion with quite a lot of interest and
I'd
> like to hear some opinions on fitting a K26 to a 3B engine...I guess
it'd
> be more efficient than the K24 at the amounts of boost I'm intending
to run
> it (1.9 Bar absolute overboost and 1.25 Bar absolute
"continuous"-regulated
> pressure) with an MTM racing chipset that puts out 295 HP (don't flame
me
> Brett, these are MTM numbers)....
> Is the RS2 turbo better or worse than a plain stock MC-1 K26?
>
> Does any of you have some spool-up figures?
>
> Thanks for your replies,
>
> Mihnea
>
There are two types of K-26's as installed on the 1986-1989 200/5000
turbo.
The difference as I know it is the exhaust exducer is larger on the
early
K-26 (1985-1986). Does anybody know the performance characteristics
between
the two?
Scott
--
More information about the quattro
mailing list