[s-cars] Serpentine belt breaking the timing belt
David.Payne at brinksinc.com
David.Payne at brinksinc.com
Tue Jun 22 07:51:40 EDT 2004
Unless, of course the timing chain is on a Mercedes. Pull the valve cover,
rotate the engine to find the master link, break the chain, attach new
chain to the old chain, rotate the motor to snake the new chain in whilst
removing the old, when you get all of the new chain in replace the master
link. Install new tensioner from the outside of the motor.
Dave.
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Kurt Deschler |
| | <desch at alum.wpi.e|
| | du> |
| | Sent by: |
| | quattro-bounces at a|
| | udifans.com |
| | |
| | |
| | 06/21/04 04:25 PM|
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: quattro at audifans.com |
| cc: Calvin & Diana Craig <calvinlc at earthlink.net> |
| Subject: RE: [s-cars] Serpantine belt breaking the timimg belt |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Have you ever tried to change a timing chain on a modern car? A lot more
has to be removed since it lives inside with the oil. Add accessories,
DOHC, and motor mounts in the way, and its a really big job. About the
same amount of work as 4-6 timing belt changes. Chains start to get sloppy
after 150k or so. I would rather a nice new belt every 50k and the service
time spaced out.
-Kurt
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Richard J Lebens <rick-l at rocketmail.com>
> Subject: RE: [s-cars] Serpantine belt breaking the timimg belt
> To: quattro at audifans.com
> Message-ID: <20040621144554.39174.qmail at web12506.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I have heard the main advantages are less noise and cost.
>
> --- Kneale Brownson <knotnook at traverse.com> wrote:
>> My guess would be the weight factor. And maybe something to do with
>> driving the water pump.
>>
>> At 09:37 AM 6/21/2004 -0400, Eric_R_Kissell at whirlpool.com wrote:
>>>
>>> "Calvin & Diana Craig" <calvinlc at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Of course all this would be solved if the damn manufacturer wasn't
>> too
>>> cheap
>>>> to use a chain or timing gears in the first place.
>>>
>>> Which opens the door for a debate as to why Audi (& Volkswagen)
>> chose a
>>> timing belt rather than a chain or gears.
>>>
>>> What are the advantages of a timing belt over other options?
>>>
>>> What are the disadvantages of a timing belt over other options?
>>>
>>> In my job that we have to balance all of the design criteria and
>> cost is
>>> only one consideration. Has Audi chosen the timing belt alternative
>> for any
>>> reason other than cost? Is the cost actually less than other
>> alternatives?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> quattro mailing list
>> quattro at audifans.com
>> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
_______________________________________________
quattro mailing list
quattro at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES:
All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or
through Brink's equipment are subject to the Brink's Electronic
Communications Policy. Employees should have no expectation of privacy in
their use of the Company's electronic mail system.
More information about the quattro
mailing list