urq $$

joel nevin joelnevin at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 26 08:50:09 EST 2004


Just coming from a design/manufactoring standpoint.

The URQ was much less in volume than the 4kq. Whenever
you have this, price goes way up.

Bodywork, wheels, plumbing etc.



--- no1of consequence <iin10ded at hotmail.com> wrote:
> <<Maybe somebody can shed some light on something
> for me. WHY was the Urq 
> $35,000?
> The 4000q has basically the same drivetrain other
> than the turbo engine, 
> right?
> Was the turbo engine really worth a $28,000 premium?
> I mean both are typ85 
> cars
> with quattro. It's not like the body was that much
> more expensive to make, 
> they
> made the CGT which is essentially the same body >>
> 
> weren't the urq's hand-assembled in a seperate
> facility, like amg/benz?  i 
> seem to recall reading that somewhere... good
> question tho.
> 
> jim
> 
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Get rid of annoying pop-up ads with the new MSN
> Toolbar – FREE! 
> http://toolbar.msn.com/go/onm00200414ave/direct/01/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> quattro mailing list
> quattro at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro


=====
"Never argue with an idiot, they drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience."

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html


More information about the quattro mailing list