oil sludge recall for 1.8t's MORE
SuffolkD at aol.com
SuffolkD at aol.com
Mon Sep 6 22:17:19 EDT 2004
Dan and Brett:
IMHO its why Audi has gone to large displacement NA engines vs the turbos of
the last 5-6 years............
Longer intervals (service) again............less warranty costs.....
No coking, no turbo issues period. (No synthetic oils either eh?)
Cheaper for them.........tuners headache though...........
-Scott by BOSTON
> Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Dan DiBiase <>
> Subject: Re:
> To: Brett Dikeman <>
>
> Brett, I think you're being a little harsh....;-) Assuming that the 20k
> example is NOT the norm (maybe a bad assumption on my part), the fact is that
> the automakers are setting themselves up for these problems by touting the
> minimal service requirements of their cars these days. (Didn't Volvo even have a
> concept car recently where you could not even open the hood??) Perfect
> example is the 10k oil change intervals in Audi's, as indicated by the free
> scheduled maintenance schedule. Until the '04 models came out, it was oil changes
> at 10k, 20k, 30k, 40k, paid for by Audi. I doubt many 'average' owners would
> have oil changes done in the interim. Even the '04 models were at 10k, after
> the first change at 5k (15k, 25k, 35k).
>
> I'll be interested to see whether buyers of '05 models still get 40k of free
> scheduled maintenance if VAG has to double the amount of oil changes
> included, now using more expensive synthetic oil.
>
> I purchased an OEM filter earlier this week, for my 10k change, and was
> given the larger (by about .5 quart) filter that came out with the '04.5 cars. I
> was told this is all they sell for the 1.8T motors now (it is actually the
> same one used on the old Rabbit diesel).
>
> Dan D
> '04 A4 1.8T q MT-6
>
More information about the quattro
mailing list