aaaargh no start problem

[Ed Kellock]

I had a similar experience with my urq.  The injector inserts were
very loose and were allowing too much air for the engine to actually
start.  It was clear that it had fuel and fire, but just too much air.

Ed

On 8/5/05, KWSTURTZ <syfer at mindspring.com> wrote:
My start problem i had on 90 Tq Pulled my hair out for 10 days turned
out to be Vacum leek .. Check and recheck every line.

> Alan Pritchard wrote:
> 
> >Ok here goes, the 90q (2.3 ng) is going, a friend of mine is taking it
> >for a project :-(
> >
> >But, I wanted to get her running before he had her away
> >
> >Heres what ha been done
> >
> >I swapped the head
> >
> >Refitted t belt, checked that the flywheel mark and the back of the cam
> >pulley line up, also verified that the lobes were upwards.
> >
> >Refitted the dizzy ensuring the rotor arm lined up with the notch on the
> >dizzy body
> >
> >Refitted the dizzy cap ensuring the correct firing order
> >
> >I have spark
> >
> >I have fuel
> >
> >But she is not even trying to start :-(
> >
> >Everything ran fine before I took her apart, only other thing that has
> >changed is that I have refitted the original cam shaft as opposed to the
> >schrick 272
> >
> > With the ignition on you can rotate the dizzy and here the fp prime as
> >it passes through the hall sensor
> >
> >I don't know where to go from here people :-(
> >
> >Best Regards
> >
> >Alan Pritchard