oxymoron: dry snow tire?
Ed Kellock
ekellock at gmail.com
Thu Nov 10 16:57:52 EST 2005
There's also the Nokian W which appears to be a replacement/descendent of
the NRW. I think it must be relatively new because they don't have a link to
Technical Data for it at www.nokiantyres.com <http://www.nokiantyres.com>
I believe the WR also descended from the NRW at least in part, going more
in the direction of performance.
Ed
On 11/10/05, LL - NY <larrycleung at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Nokian WR. It's Nokian's "All-Season" but it's biased towards
> snow performance (i.e. ranks maybe mid-pack against dedicated
> studless snows) but can handle extended use at warmer temps.
> Handles (apparently, I've always had dedicated snows such as
> the RSi) more like a sloppy All-Season, rather than as a dedicated
> snow, so that's your trade-off. Oh that, and the price.
> LL - NY
>
> On 11/10/05, c dyer <cdyer_2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > Car is a '87 5ktq: anyone know of a winter/snow tire
> > that is fairly decent in the dry?
> >
> > I'm looking b/c I go up to the mtns for snowboarding,
> > but 4/5's of the drive is accross the Mojave. (plus my
> > daily driving is in L.A., so...) My pavement needs
> > aren't aggressive--I mean it's stop-n-go, potholes
> > galore...maybe a high-profile SUV tire is what I
> > need!!
> >
> > I'd like "snowflake on the mtn" symbol tires, but if
> > possible, avoid the high-silica compound. I think it's
> > that compound that is used to enhance ice traction,
> > but also wears very quickly on pavement.
> >
> > One in the running is the Bridgestone LM-18; I don't
> > think it has the typical blizzak tread compound.
> > Thoughts? Suggestions?
> >
> > t.i.a.
> >
> >
> > Chris Dyer
> > (310) 442-2190 home
> > (310) 567-9863 cell
> > 866 Westgate Ave. #8
> > Los Angeles, CA 90049
>
More information about the quattro
mailing list