comments on 2008 a4 3.2q

[Grant Lenahan]

on that part of the topic, i always liked the 1.8t and the 2.0 is torquier. So i dont get that concern either.

Grant
On Apr 23, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Henry A Harper III wrote:

> 
> I had similar thoughts as Steve - depends on what your priorities are (do
> you care about the price of gas). I've had a (stock) 2.0T manual avant for 6
> months now and I wouldn't say it was anemic. Maybe not as powerful on the
> top end as the chipped 200q20v I had for 14 years but really no complaints,
> it does feel like it gets off the line better - throttle calibration/direct
> injection maybe. And this morning, 34mpg (reported by trip computer anyway)
> on a 65-mile round trip 20 minutes in town/30 minutes freeway per leg, calm
> winds, flat roads, no traffic to interfere with cruise at/slightly above
> speed limit.
> 
>> 
>> 2.0t with APR Stage 1.  No more anemia and better mileage.
>> 
>> On 4/23/2011 9:23 AM, Jeffrey Brown wrote:
>>> considering a change and saw a nice look 2008 a4 3.2q for sale.
>> i am not so
>>> familiar with the 3.2 so I was wondering if you all had an
>> opinion in terms
>>> of reliability or known problems, or if this is an engine to avoid.
>>> 
>>> i find the 2.0tq a bit anemic in terms of acceleration hence
>> looking at the
>>> 3.2's
>>> 
>>> Thanks as always for your collective wisdom
> 
> _______________________________________________
> quattro mailing list
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
> 

Grant Lenahan
glenahan at vfemail.net