Second car

[Grant Lenahan]

I have had.....none of the above.

But i did have a 1995 C4 A6 2.8 auto - slow, solid, easy to work on, reliable.

I also had a 2000 S4 with the 2.7 mt6. Superb, over-built combination. Some complexity in forced air track, and, of course, if turbos were not treated well they can be a costly weak link.  Make sure that air suspension is solid or it will get costly fast.

"training roadster" is what?

mileage, condition and price all play a role.

I would likely go with the AR, but only if it really checks out, o is sufficiently stupid cheap that it doesn't matter.

Grant

On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Vincent Gelinas wrote:

> I'm going to be in the market for a second car soon enough, and there are a
> couple of things I'm looking between,  both at Force5.
> 
> 1)  2002 Allroad 6mt 2.7tt
> 2)  1994 90q, 12v 2.8 5mt
> 3)  the fun car,  2003 training roadster,  6mt
> Or lost likely, the easy to fix beater...   4)  1999 mk4 jetta vr6 5mt
> 
> Any btdt on each of the cars? I love delivering in my a8q, but if I don't
> need the 4wd, the mileage isn't worth it, which is why the vr6 jetta seems
> like a good candidate.
> 
> Tia,
> 
> V
> _______________________________________________
> quattro mailing list
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>