Second car

[Vincent Gelinas]

Whoops I meant tt. Damn Autocorrect. The vr is only 2k and will probably be
cheap to insure, is already chipped with a borla exhaust and a cam I think.
It needs a door and headlights, so 400 worth of parts and gives me an
excuse to go HID.
On Dec 10, 2011 3:03 PM, "Grant Lenahan" <glenahan at vfemail.net> wrote:

> I have had.....none of the above.
>
> But i did have a 1995 C4 A6 2.8 auto - slow, solid, easy to work on,
> reliable.
>
> I also had a 2000 S4 with the 2.7 mt6. Superb, over-built combination.
> Some complexity in forced air track, and, of course, if turbos were not
> treated well they can be a costly weak link.  Make sure that air suspension
> is solid or it will get costly fast.
>
> "training roadster" is what?
>
> mileage, condition and price all play a role.
>
> I would likely go with the AR, but only if it really checks out, o is
> sufficiently stupid cheap that it doesn't matter.
>
> Grant
>
> On Dec 10, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Vincent Gelinas wrote:
>
> > I'm going to be in the market for a second car soon enough, and there
> are a
> > couple of things I'm looking between,  both at Force5.
> >
> > 1)  2002 Allroad 6mt 2.7tt
> > 2)  1994 90q, 12v 2.8 5mt
> > 3)  the fun car,  2003 training roadster,  6mt
> > Or lost likely, the easy to fix beater...   4)  1999 mk4 jetta vr6 5mt
> >
> > Any btdt on each of the cars? I love delivering in my a8q, but if I don't
> > need the 4wd, the mileage isn't worth it, which is why the vr6 jetta
> seems
> > like a good candidate.
> >
> > Tia,
> >
> > V
> > _______________________________________________
> > quattro mailing list
> > http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
> > http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
> >
>
>