VW 2.0T question

Dan DiBiase d_dibiase at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 1 08:02:44 PST 2012


Sounds like a smart move on your friend's part..... The new Accord is actually a lot nicer than the model it replaces, less bloated
looking. And it will certainly be reliable (if he changes the oil regularly  ;-)

Dan D
'04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
Central NJ USA



________________________________
 From: Steve Meyer <quattroslm at yahoo.com>
To: Grant Lenahan <glenahan at vfemail.net>; Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase at yahoo.com> 
Cc: Eric Huppert <ehuppert at hvc.rr.com>; quattro at audifans.com 
Sent: Saturday, December 1, 2012 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: VW 2.0T question 
 

I'm going to start with Wow! I didn't think my question would spark such interest and my head is spinning from oil talk.

Unfortunately, one of my friends made a bad decision when purchased his Passat. It seemed a little "worn" for a 60k mile car, so it wasn't probably the best example.  Nevertheless, the mechanic we both use still pushes us to change oil everything 3000 miles. That way even when we're late...it's still under 5000 miles. But, none of this matters for him anymore.  He traded his Passat for a new Honda Accord yesterday. It pained him to get a Honda (he's got a '74 Westie also), but he's a realtor and something reliable.  He told me his topped off his oil Monday and Thursday it wasn't registering on the dipstick.  Time to trade.

I haven't had time to discuss all the info with my other friend.  I think he bought his Passat from a Audi/VW dealer...but that doesn't mean it was taken car of. 

Thank you all for the info. Once again the knowledge and support of this list amazes me! 

Steve

Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless

-----Original message-----

From: Grant Lenahan <glenahan at vfemail.net>
>To: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase at yahoo.com>
>Cc: Eric Huppert <ehuppert at hvc.rr.com>, "quattro at audifans.com" <quattro at audifans.com>
>Sent: Fri, Nov 30, 2012 13:25:11 GMT+00:00
>Subject: Re: VW 2.0T question 
>
>Yes and no.  I've tried awfully hard to make the point that we must have to look at the environment oil will be used in, and compare it to its specs.
>
>The corollary pf this is: " there are not good and bad oils, only different oils for different applications".
>
>You can change your oil every 1000 miles, but if it will go into a 400 deg environment, and has a 275 deg flash point, its gonna fail.
>
>Of course its not that simple, oil loses grade with time sue to shear and dilution, etc - but the principle remains.
>
>For daily drivers - yes. For 2.0 turbos ( the subject of this thread after all) - i don't completely agree, although the idea is still useful.
>
>Grant
>On Nov 30, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Dan DiBiase wrote:
>
>> Seems to me the most important thing is actually changing the oil (and filter) on a regular basis, and not so much the type of oil
>> used, although I have used synthetic (Mobil1 0w-40) in my car since 5k miles. At 118k miles, I use no oil between
>> my regular 5k mile oil and filter changes. I've been religious about 5k changes, even if it is overkill with the synthetic. I have
>> been using only the OEM (4.5 qt) filters as well. 
>> 
>> The problem is that most Americans don't pay any attention to regular changes, so the manufacturers try and protect us from
>> ourselves by recommending synthetics in many cases, since they traditionally last a little longer than dino oil.
>> 
>> Dan D
>> '04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
>> Central NJ USA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> _______________________________________________
>> quattro mailing list
>> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
>> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>quattro mailing list
>http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
>http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>


More information about the quattro mailing list