What car to replace my '87 4kq? (long)
Andrew Buc
abuc at andrewbuc.com
Sun Feb 23 20:20:36 PST 2014
I've had my 4kq for slightly over 14 years, and my fondness for it is
undiminished, but owning it is becoming less practical. I'm dividing
this post into 4 sections: the Reader's Digest version of my sitch,
the War and Peace version, my criteria for the next car, and my
thoughts on what the replacement car might be.
READER'S DIGEST VERSION:
In the last couple years, the car has become somewhat less reliable.
The basic car is pretty sound, but I'm experiencing component
failures. A car this age with 253K on it is probably entitled to some
component failures; the question is whether I can live with it. Parts
are also getting harder to find, and this is really the worst aspect
of the situation. (My garage reports a similar situation with
contemporary VWs.) Furthermore, my commute to work really can't be
done by public transit.
BEGIN WAR AND PEACE VERSION
In the last couple of years, prior to the past 6 weeks, I've
experienced the following:
(1) Stopped by police last summer, told I had no brake lights and
couldn't drive the car, effective immediately, until they were fixed.
Nothing to do but flat-bed the car to my garage.
(2) Gas pedal linkage abruptly came adrift.
(3) About a year ago: CV joint failed.
(4) Radiator sprang a leak 2 years ago.
The leak was tolerable--I topped the cooling system up as required
until I could get the radiator replaced. But the first 3 items made
the car mechanically or legally undriveable. I've been lucky in that
none of them happened at extremely inconvenient times and places. The
gas pedal linkage let go on the way to work, a mile from home and
~3/4 mile from my garage, and I was able to limp to the garage on
idle over back streets. There's no guarantee that I'll always be this
lucky. When the CV joint failed, I was pulling into the parking lot
at work. I'd been on the freeway 5 minutes earlier.
Of course, the gas pedal linkage was simple. On the CV-joint failure,
the garage was able to turn the car around in 24 hours. On the brake
light switch, it took 12 calendar days, mostly waiting for the (new,
not wrecking yard) switch to arrive. I was able to get to work by a
combination of public transit and carpooling with coworkers, but it
made my total day (out the door in the a.m. to home in the p.m.)
almost 2.5 hours longer and was generally onerous. Renting a car for
that long would have been spendy.
The last 6 weeks have been a case of "when it rains, it pours." One
morning on the way to work, the alternator failed. I got some early
warning (dim instrument lights, red instead of green voltage LED on
the console), and I came off the freeway. The car died on surface
streets in very light traffic, close to home, and I was able to coast
over to the curb. As luck would have it, the garage was able to
source an alternator quickly, and I was good to go that afternoon. I
recently noticed some uneven tire wear and took the car in for
alignment. The alignment shop said, in effect, "Come back when you've
replaced the worn suspension bits."
So I took the car in last week for the suspension work, after
confirming that the garage had rounded up the parts in advance.
Fortunately, my garage sometimes works on Saturdays and has a loaner
car available. (Small garage, there's only one loaner.) They found
that the rear pads and rotors also needed replaced. On the
suspension, they were able to get new bushings for the front, but for
the rear, they had to buy entire control arms. I asked the mechanic
if it would have been possible to get the rear bushings by themselves
10 years ago, and he said probably.
When I picked up the car the evening of Wednesday 2/19/14, I thought
the brake pedal was spongy. The mechanic said the brakes should bed
in in a couple of days. I drove the car to work next day, thought the
pedal was really spongy, and swung by the garage that afternoon. The
mechanic looked under the car and spotted a leaking seal on the LR
caliper. (I didn't really pursue the question of whether it was
damaged during the previous brake work.) At this point, the loaner
had been promised to another customer for next day. They ordered a
new caliper Thursday morning, got it Friday afternoon, and had the
car ready for me around noon Saturday. So I had to get a rental for 2
days. Anyway, they didn't charge me labor for the caliper replacement.
3 or 4 weeks ago, both windows on the left side refused to open. The
LF window started to work again a few days later, but I rolled it up
and won't risk opening it again for now. My mechanic's (reasonable)
guess was it was probably a wiring problem rather than both switches
going out at once, but when he had it in for the other work, he
determined that both switches are bad. He's now trying to source
replacements. I guess I'll find out if they're NLA. Chris Semple is
great, if it comes to that, but IMO parts like that are best bought
new. Again, the situation could have been worse. The windows could
have stuck open rather than closed, and Seattle is famous for rainy
winters.
I'm starting to wonder when the next shoe will drop. I'm planning a
weekend trip to Portland, Oregon, 175 miles away, in a couple of
months, and I plan to rent a car.
Concerning my commute, I started a new job 2 months ago. I can't
assume that carpooling with a coworker in a pinch is even a
possibility. My starting time is so early that even catching a bus to
meet my carpool may not be workable.
Anyway, I've recently put ~$1500 into the car, and I'll be looking at
another $200 for alignment and a rental while the car is being
aligned. And that's not counting the window switches. I don't think
in terms of "This repair is $X, and the resale value of the car is
$Y." I do think in terms of, "If I do this repair, what kind of
service will the car give me for the foreseeable future?"
END WAR AND PEACE VERSION
So, what would I replace the 4kq with? I know that one car may not
check all the boxes, but here are the criteria:
AWD: Not as important as you might think. Here in Seattle we get snow
some years, but not like Minnesota. I've been running Vredestein
Quatrac 3 winter tires (mountain and snowflake on the sides) year
round, and would do the same on the next car.
Size: The 4kq is about the right size, but I'm open to going a bit
bigger or smaller.
Passive safety: Very important. I've never forgotten the time in '72
when my Saab 96 was t-boned in the passenger compartment by a
Plymouth Duster and went greasy side up, and my passenger and I
walked away without a scratch.
Total cost of ownership (parts, gas, service, the whole enchilada)
should be reasonable. All other factors equal, a car that needs 2
hours of labor to change the timing belt is better than one that
needs 4. I'll probably be retiring in the next 5 or 10 years,
although I don't have a firm date set. Reliability is obviously
important. Parts also need to be available quickly, not like that
brake light switch, for some years to come. The car should have sold
in reasonable numbers in the US so there will be plenty of parts in
wrecking yards. I learned the latter lesson a few years ago with an
'84 VW Quantum. (I didn't really want a Cosworth Vega anyway.) Maybe
I should go for a bread and butter car rather than an upscale car.
This may not be too bad--I gather bread and butter cars have improved
greatly in the last 25 years. The 4kq's gas mileage is tolerable, but
I wouldn't mind doing better with the next car.
Handling: Should be reasonably good. I suspect I have the lightest
right foot on the list, but I like the 4kq's responsiveness and
feeling of oneness with the road. At least I'd like a car that isn't
a yawn, like the rental Corolla I had a while back. I liked my
Peugeot 504, which was softer than the 4kq, but not in a sloppy land-
yacht way. Audis have been criticized for their nose-heaviness, but
given my driving style, that doesn't bother me.
I'm a bit wary of gadgets like satnav, keyless entry, etc.--they
strike me as more things to go wrong. I'm also a bit wary of
electronic instrument panels. I'm thinking of a "Car Talk" response a
while back to someone who had a few-years-old Volvo with a dead
clock: "You can't just replace the clock. You'd have to replace the
whole instrument cluster, which is $1000. You're going to get an
aftermarket digital clock and stick it to the dash." (What happens
when an essential instrument, like the gas gauge, in an integrated
cluster fails?) But on a newer car I may have to accept more
electronics.
Cars I've considered, not necessarily in great detail:
Japanese cars in general: Reliable, but I question their passive
safety. We had a case a few months ago where a drunk driver hit a
Mazda Protege head-on at freeway speed, and there was a photo in the
paper of what was left of the Protege, from the B-pillar to the rear
bumper. Not pretty. Of course the Protege driver was killed. If any
Japanese automaker has made strides in passive safety when I wasn't
watching, I'm all ears.
Saturn SL/SW: The fuel economy, reliability, and passive safety
appeal. On the down side, most of them are probably getting up in
miles by now. A friend with an '04 Saturn LW says they've just
discontinued OEM parts.
Volvo: Famous for passive safety. S40/V40/V50 is about the right
size. The others are really bigger than I need. An upscale car, so
I'd be concerned about running costs.
A newer VW Jetta: I'd consider one if the buzz is favorable.
B3/B4 transverse-engine Passat: See Jetta above.
Ford Contour or Focus: See Jetta. These were more or less designed by
Ford Europe, so I'd be OK with the fact that they're American.
B5 or later Passat/A4: The V6 is more engine than I need, and I've
heard about the sludge issues with the 1.8T. But no car is perfect,
and I might consider one of these if it was a good compromise.
Also, I'd like whatever I get to have an autobox.
I'm going to throw out a tentative price point of $3000 to $3500. I'm
sure I'll find out whether that's realistic! If I do trade the 4kq,
we've had a good run.
Thanks for your collective wisdom, as always.
More information about the quattro
mailing list