[s-cars] MFTS Replaced Tools and Procedure Enclosed

[Vincent Frégeac]

In fact, the two designs should give the same reading. On my 90Q20V, I
switched from the active (4 prongs) to the passive (3 prongs) MFTS and
kept exactly the same reading: too low :( but it was the same "too low"
:P


Vincent.

-----Message d'origine-----
De : s-car-list-admin at audifans.com
[mailto:s-car-list-admin at audifans.com] De la part de CLAG500 at aol.com
Envoyé : 4 novembre 2002 17:46
À : tedebearp at yahoo.com
Cc : s-car-list at audifans.com
Objet : Re: [s-cars] MFTS Replaced Tools and Procedure Enclosed

In a message dated 11/4/2002 2:42:40 PM Eastern Standard Time,
tedebearp at yahoo.com writes:

> my old MFTS was a 4-prong.  the new one is a 3-prong.  did
> you make
> a similar change?

I did change to the 3 prong also. The MFTS had been acting up ever since
I bought the car so I didn't really have a properly functioning guage to
compare it to. My t-stat was also bad so it's hard to tell. I suppose it
would read somewhat  differently though as it is a totally dfferent
design. It doesn't have a +12v power source going to it IIRC.

Chad
_______________________________________________
S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 09/10/2002


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.401 / Virus Database: 226 - Release Date: 09/10/2002