[s-cars] '93 UrS dyno results

[QSHIPQ at aol.com]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
The dyno run was full battle dress RS2 - including EC.  That said, I'm with
Rob on the butt dyno, RS2 EC is an optional item in terms of running
differences, the other hardware items make a bigger difference.  I've done
non EC RS2 setups of the stage III variety, that really didn't run well until
all the other electronic items were installed.  IOW, the cam is an "optional"
item as Rob points out in terms of the software.  I will also share that I've
installed EC in k24 cars with stage I software with subtle results, and no
codes to the stage I software either.  Kinda confirms BP and my opinion on
this hardware item.

At some point, with enough dyno data, this list should have a pretty good
idea what each item adds to the party.  Right now, I'm only sharing what I
have logged with RS2 <all = RS2 EC, EM, Turbo, MAF, FI, FPR + stage III MTM>
installed.  Anything less, YMMV.

HTH

SJ


In a message dated 10/1/02 2:47:12 PM Central Daylight Time,
jimk at spotgraphicsinc.com writes:


Coupel of things:
Scott:  Please confirm if Exhaust cam was stock on the below.  "NO
Firmware cahnges" would indicate that, just doublechecking.
Frank:  Noted that you have a K+N panel filter, presumably corrently
oiled.  Since you;re doing everything else, make SURE your MAF wires are
clean.  Mine had a light coating of oil, even when cleaned it never
worked right, swapping to a good MAF (and a stock paper filter element)
solved several drivability issues for me.
Thanks,
JimK