[s-cars] RS6 vs. E55 vs. BMW M5

Paul Park Paul.Park at Colorado.EDU
Fri Jan 17 11:17:22 EST 2003


*whistles*

Sure wish I could pony up the dozens of thousands of dollars to even be
in the position of having either of these cars.

Perry said:
"The RS6 is in my opinion the ULTIMATE stealth machine! The E55 is
stuffy =
and cheaply executed, the M5 interior design looks 10yrs old and the
exteri=
or design looks like an early 90's Ford Taurus. Topping it off, neither
is =
availalable in the states with AWD!!! Severely outdated design and
executio=
n!
  I'm drooling to think I'll be riding in yours on sunday!!!"

Wanna know stealth? Buy a Ford Crown Victoria Interceptor Black on
black steelies with Kenny Brown upgraded internals. THAT'S stealth.
Nothing like making everyone around you slow down in fear(maybe that's
a bad thing, damn LLBs).

How can you criticize the M5 based solely on its interior(which is
aging, but still attractive), and its now 6 year old design(which is
still better than the Banglized Bimmers of recent)? Comparing it to a
Ford Taurus? That's a bit of a stretch. It is the benchmark in its
rather sparse class, and currently, it is the only to offer the ever
important row-it-your-own option. The press doesn't regard it as the
perfect car without reason.

I'd like to hear why you think the $88,000 Hammer E55 is cheaply
executed. With the vault-like structure reputation E-Class have had in
the past(less now, I know, but still), as well as the steep price mated
to the most powerful engine in its class...I think that's hardly
grounds for referring to it as cheaply executed.

Of course that's just me. In any case, I love this round of the German
Horsepower Wars.






More information about the S-car-list mailing list