[s-cars] Re: UrA6/UrS6 US DOT headlight

tony.curran at sympatico.ca tony.curran at sympatico.ca
Thu Jun 10 10:01:45 EDT 2004


I wasn't happy with the stock lo-beam bulbs. I replaced mine about a year ago with PIAA Xtreme White bulbs - direct replacement - same wattage more lumens, probably more expensive than the GP. Significant difference. I'd post the pics but don't have them on a serever. Can e-mail them if you are interested.

I replaced my headlight lenses with Euro spec ones a couple of weeks ago and noticed no deformation of the replectors due to overheating.

Tony
96 S6

> 
> From: "Robert Welch" <Robert.Welch at TechnologyCrafters.com>
> Date: 2004/06/10 Thu AM 02:12:37 EST
> To: "'Dave Forgie'" <forgied at ae.ca>,  <s-car-list at audifans.com>, 
> 	<quattro20v at telus.net>
> CC: l.leung at juno.com
> Subject: RE: [s-cars] Re: UrA6/UrS6 US DOT headlight
> 
> Hey guys,
> 
> I'd just like to double check the obvious question regarding the group
> purchase/ upgrade to Halogen Infrared Bulbs.....can I safely perform this
> upgrade and not have the plastic reflector melt due to the increased heat of
> the bulbs? I've read the posts and the URL's, I'd just like to confirm that
> this simple upgrade replaces nothing but the bulbs, while the flimsy OEM
> reflectors remain in place without melting down.
> 
>  I'm presuming someone has already 'been there done that".
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> 
> Robert Welch
> 95 S6 Avant
> 93 S4 
> Golden, CO
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com
> [mailto:s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf Of Dave Forgie
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 5:49 PM
> To: s-car-list at audifans.com; quattro20v at telus.net
> Cc: l.leung at juno.com
> Subject: RE: [s-cars] Re: UrA6/UrS6 US DOT headlight
> 
> Yeh, like you said.  H1 low and 9005 (65 W) high.  The question is still,
> why did you get an H1 low?  Igor, before you changed to Euro's what did your
> 97 S6 have for headlight bulbs?
> 
> Dave F.
> 
> >>> "Sean Douglas" <quattro20v at telus.net> 06/06/04 04:08PM >>>
> Oops, I meant 9005 high.
> 
> Sean
> 
> P.S. Urs4.com is wrong on this and has reversed 9005 and 9006.
> http://www.urs4.com/technical/headlights.html#euro%20vs%20dot  
> 
> Sean Douglas
> 1997 Audi S6 - MTM Stage 1+
> 1990 Audi 90Q20V
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com  
> > [mailto:s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf Of Sean Douglas
> > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 3:59 PM
> > To: 'Dave Forgie'; s-car-list at audifans.com  
> > Cc: l.leung at juno.com  
> > Subject: RE: [s-cars] Re: UrA6/UrS6 US DOT headlight
> >  
> >  
> > Dave:
> >  
> > Minor correction, the 1997 S6 got H1 low and 9006 high.
> >  
> > Sean Douglas
> > 1997 Audi S6 mit RS2 goodies
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com  
> > > [mailto:s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf Of Dave Forgie
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 12:54 PM
> > > To: s-car-list at audifans.com  
> > > Cc: l.leung at juno.com  
> > > Subject: [s-cars] Re: UrA6/UrS6 US DOT headlight
> > >  
> > >  
> > > Bob and Larry:  For the most part (99%) you are correct.  The
> > > odd late (eg. 04/97) build date S6 (only in Canada in  
> > > NAmerica) got H1 High and lows.  I do NOT know why.  The  
> > > biggest thing is the newer Toshiba 9012 bulbs can replace the  
> > > 9006 and the 9011 can replace the 9005 at relatively low cost  
> > > for a lot more lumens.  Check these postings:
> > >  
> > http://www.audifans.com/pipermail/s-car-list/2004-May/029598.html  
> >  
> > and
> >  
> http://www.audifans.com/pipermail/s-car-list/2004-June/029709.html  
> Dave F.
> 
> Trying to confirm the bulb requirements
> > for the UrA6/S6
> >
> > Low Beam 9006
> > High Beam 9005
> > Fog H3
> > ?
> >> LL - NY
> 
> 
> This e-mail and its attachments are intended solely for the person or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged   
> information.  Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
> of   
> this e-mail by persons or entities other than the addressee is
> prohibited    
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender   
> immediately and delete the material from any computer.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com  
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com  
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list  
> 
> 
> 
> This e-mail and its attachments are intended solely for the person or entity
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged  
> information.  Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use of  
> this e-mail by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited   
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender  
> immediately and delete the material from any computer.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
> 
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
> 



More information about the S-CAR-List mailing list