[s-cars] Mihnea is a tree huggin hippie!!!!!

[Krasusky Paul (WQQ2PXK)]

Awesome, great data point Calvin.  Thanks, good to hear.  

Allegedly removing both the precats and main cat in my 2.3-16
reaaaaaaaaaaaaally woke her up, but that's watermelons to kumquats.
Guess it's on the ever growing to do list now.  Always and only
"strictly for off road use" butofcourse.  

The 2.3-16 schhhhhTANK as result tho, hoping these being turbo cars burn
acceptably less nauseatingly.  Poor bastards behind me, which is
basically everyone, always...  except when I back up.  Gasp.  Pizzo's
stunk a bit, but that of course really isn't saying a heck of a lot.
And I noted a tint of olive oil to it, hmmm...

-Paul chasing pussy here kitty kitty in CT K.
appreciable brain cell depletion from bearing down on TR3 fumes while
reversing



-----Original Message-----
From: calvinlc at earthlink.net [mailto:calvinlc at earthlink.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 9:56 PM
To: Serge Filanovsky; Bill Mahoney; s-car-list at audifans.com
Cc: Krasusky Paul (WQQ2PXK)
Subject: RE: [s-cars] Mihnea is a tree huggin hippie!!!!!


I took a test in my '89 200 with, shall we say, an unpopulated
catalytic.
It came ohh so very close to passing.  It sounds like, at least in one
of
the examples you guys were talking about, it was not an IM240 test on
the
dyno.  That is what I did with the '89.  I will say that there is a HUGE
difference in that car between cat and no cat.  The boost threshold is
lowered by about 300-400 rpm I would say.  Of course that is a single
exhaust with a K26 Turbo so it's kind of apples and oranges.....well
maybe
tangerines and oranges :)
--Calvin