[s-cars] URS4 vs Biturbo S4

[calvinlc at earthlink.net]

Even though a little late to the discussion I just wanted to add that the
URs4 had a cost of almost 50k in 1992 dollars, whereas the bi-turbo was
around 44k in 2003 dollars......hmmmmm...which one do you think had more
quality in it?
--Calvin


-----Original Message-----
From: s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com
[mailto:s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com]On Behalf Of JR
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 2:59 PM
To: s-car-list at www.audifans.com
Subject: [s-cars] URS4 vs Biturbo S4


Aside from the URS4 being less expensive due to its age why would one
choose the URS4 over the Biturbo 2000-2003 S4?  Why would one choose the
Biturbo over the URS4?  Why do you folks prefer the URS4 over the
Biturbo?

I'm at a crossroads with the car.  The URS4 is a known money pit always
needing attention.  I'm wondering if it would be less costly in the long
run to just upgrade to a used Biturbo now or keep the URS4 and keep
putting money into it.  Are the Biturbos just as needy?  Does insurance
hurt more?  Is the engine as strong and will it last as many miles as I
hear the URS4 will?

Thoughts?


JR
_______________________________________________
S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list