[s-cars] Crank Pulley GB

JAM jscarstuff at charter.net
Fri Jun 23 08:41:42 EDT 2006


There has been another failure that I am aware of.  A friend who lives just 
out of Asheville had failure of the crank pulley on his S6.  His actually 
slipped and caused the car to stop running altogether and I hear it wasn't 
the easiest thing to diagnose since the timing marks still line up.  I had 
mine replaced when the timing belt was done entirely because of his 
experience.  I would recommend replacing it at every or every other timing 
belt change.  I think his car had 140k miles on it when it slipped.
Jason Mawhinney
'95.5 S6 avant
'87 5ktq

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Green" <trgreen at comcast.net>
To: <s-car-list at audifans.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Crank Pulley GB


> Looks like from the latest reports that perhaps we need to be looking
> at harmonic balancers rather than just the sprocket.   Two failures
> doesn't establish an epidemic but it is disturbing, and heretofore
> unknown to the masses.
>
> Are there other failures of the harmonic balancer out there that have
> escaped notice of the list?
>
> Tom
>
>> I said:
>> I don't mind calling Clair and a few others about a quantity buy,
>> but I gave the list on that part, so I wouldn't expect we could
>> command a better price than - 20%, or $68 in individual hands.
>>
>> Now, if those who have bandied about that $45 figure would step
>> up and tell where to execute that buy, then such an effort could be
>> successful. :-)
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>> I previously wrote:
>>> Is that the 034-105-263-A pulley that lists for $76.39?  If so, we
>>> may be
>>> looking for a group buy of those $45 pulleys.  :-)
>>>
>>> I paid $68.75 in Feb.
>>>
>>> Parts direct at s-cars.org has a 054 105 255 A crankshaft pulley for
>>> $105,
>>> but I think that is the serpentine belt pulley that is bolted to the
>>> harmonic
>>> balancer ? or timing belt pulley.
>>
>>> PK offers:
>>> I smell another GB...  count me in, since you're offering 8-).  Seems
>>> we've got a number here that would already be in, and considering the
>>> CPS GB success, this would likely be similar?  Someone, go for it?
>>> NOT
>>> IT!
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> S-CAR-List mailing list
>> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
>> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>>
>>
>> End of S-CAR-List Digest, Vol 32, Issue 74
>> ******************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list 


More information about the S-CAR-List mailing list