[s-cars] On the Road Again

[Mark Strangways]

It seems you are comparing this to a 2.7 V6 BT correct ?

Who is to say that the 2.7 is really that efficient.
Since Hap has done just a bit of work to the engine, I think it's safe to 
assume that the heads will flow well, the TB isn't too restrictive, and the 
IC doesn't loose 2-4 PSI at these flow rates. I am sure he has paid 
attention to flow rules thru his intake piping.

Maybe his 7 PSI at the turbo is still 7 PSI at the cylinder.
I am not sure what your assumptions are, and I am not gonna put any words in 
your mouth.
I am not trying to say your wrong, I am just adding my thoughts.

There are a ton of factors that will determine just how much power will be 
made.
If he can blow 7 psi in there at good temps and not retard his timing (and 
his timing has been well optimized), I don't see it all that far fetched to 
be achieving said power levels.

People make more on less displacement.
Really there are many factors missing from this argument. With out all the 
factors, it's really all just theories.

Mark
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Djdawson2 at aol.com>
To: <calvinlc at earthlink.net>; <CaptMagu at aol.com>; 
<joe.pizzimenti at gmail.com>; <tedebearp at yahoo.com>
Cc: <s-car-list at audifans.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [s-cars] On the Road Again


>
> In a message dated 3/26/2006 6:56:51 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> calvinlc at earthlink.net writes:
>
> Really?  You think so, Dave?  How does it get that extra  efficiency? 
> Given
> a constant 7 psi and similar flows the only  difference is the 
> temperature.
>
>
>
> And the efficiency of the compressor itself.  Hap's results are 
> consistent
> with another local running a 2.5.  He posted 384whp running  14psi.  He 
> then
> turned up the boost, and smoked his Centerforce clutch on  the dyno before 
> the
> pull could complete.
>
> You may not be trying to throw rocks... but really you are.  Again,  you 
> are
> one of many folks on this list who routinely post a doubting  reactions to
> someone else's facts, as demonstrated by a dyno test.   Why?  Do you think 
> Hap is
> lying?  Some of us have gone to absurd  lengths to end the debate... but 
> it
> continues.  I validated with reasonable  certainty that our "CO" dyno 
> results
> are factual... not inflated.
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>