[s-cars] On the Road Again - Sorry

[chris chambers]

Calvin,


I commend you for an understanding sensitive well thought out email.


Now on to arguing over cupholders ..... :-)

Chris





--- calvinlc at earthlink.net wrote:

> >You may not be trying to throw rocks... but really you are.  Again,
> you are
> one of many folks on this list who routinely post a doubting
> reactions to
> someone else's facts, >as demonstrated by a dyno test.  Why?  Do you
> think
> Hap is lying?
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Boy oh boy...this is why I hate e-mails about what seems to be a
> sensitive
> topic.  I must have said something in one of my e-mails that is
> construed
> differently than I meant it to be....I'm sorry.
> 
> Let me say one thing in defense, though.  I think I have been thrown
> into a
> grouping of people with which I don't belong.  I have purposely
> stayed away
> from this dyno debate in the past, because it's just not that
> significant.
> I have deleted hundreds of posts on this topic without even opening
> them.
> Maybe my memory is incorrect...I don't know.....
> 
> Why on earth would I think Hap is lying?  He, along with the rest of
> the
> people on this list, have never been anything but nice to me and I
> have no
> reason to doubt anyone's credibility.  Questioning numbers in an
> equation is
> not questioning someone's integrity......if this was the case at my
> job we
> would have a 100% failure rate and everybody would constantly be mad
> at each
> other.
> 
> Since I have not been privy to all of the conversation that has gone
> on
> (reference deleted e-mails above) I may have posed some questions
> that were
> already covered ground.  That being said, I don't think it should be
> considered "bad" to question results/numbers/statistics, etc.  It
> certainly
> shouldn't be construed as an attack of any sort.  I am always trying
> to
> learn, and a lot of times I learn by posing questions and debating
> answers.
> 
> Dave, I am truly sorry if I said something that infers I think anyone
> here
> is lying.
> 
> >Enough with the pissing contest about who understands Corky Bell
> better.
> Who cares?
> 
> Ian,
> If this was written in response to my e-mail I have most certainly
> left you
> with an impression I did not mean to leave.  If I knew 10% of what
> Dave and
> others on this list know about turbocharging I would be happy.  I am
> no
> expert here and certainly am not trying to do anything more than
> learn, and
> sometimes I do that by debating.  My engine building and drag racing
> experience has given me a good bit of knowledge about normally
> aspirated
> engines and I am only trying to reconcile my database in this area
> with
> others' knowledge banks on this list in regards to highly boosted
> S-cars.
> 
> I apologize profusely if I have in some way offended any of you....it
> is
> never my intention on these boards to do that...especially to a group
> of
> individuals like exists on this board that are so helpful to one
> another
> (and to me for that matter).
> 
> --Calvin
> 
> 
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Djdawson2 at aol.com [mailto:Djdawson2 at aol.com]
>   Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 9:53 PM
>   To: calvinlc at earthlink.net; CaptMagu at aol.com;
> joe.pizzimenti at gmail.com;
> tedebearp at yahoo.com
>   Cc: s-car-list at audifans.com
>   Subject: Re: [s-cars] On the Road Again
> 
> 
>   In a message dated 3/26/2006 6:56:51 PM Mountain Standard Time,
> calvinlc at earthlink.net writes:
>     Really?  You think so, Dave?  How does it get that extra
> efficiency?
> Given
>     a constant 7 psi and similar flows the only difference is the
> temperature.
> 
>   And the efficiency of the compressor itself.  Hap's results are
> consistent
> with another local running a 2.5.  He posted 384whp running 14psi. 
> He then
> turned up the boost, and smoked his Centerforce clutch on the dyno
> before
> the pull could complete.
> 
>   You may not be trying to throw rocks... but really you are.  Again,
> you
> are one of many folks on this list who routinely post a doubting
> reactions
> to someone else's facts, as demonstrated by a dyno test.  Why?  Do
> you think
> Hap is lying?  Some of us have gone to absurd lengths to end the
> debate...
> but it continues.  I validated with reasonable certainty that our
> "CO" dyno
> results are factual... not inflated.
> 
>   Dave
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
> 


Make April 15th just another day http://www.fairtax.org


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com