[s-cars] for sale stuff

Mon Jan 15 15:47:37 EST 2007

I don't disagree..Brett sometimes posts mindless
dribble..but Dan made him his 2nd in charge..again I
think you all should bother Dan if it's a problem
following rules.

 & talking bout who administers this list...who is
he/she(politically correct)..wonder what that person
thinks?????

& I know of a bunch of listers who have sold..or don't
have an //scar who post on the ..scar list..yours
truly included :-)

Maybe Pizzo...or PK...or Tom M..need to stop posting
if that's your way of thinking..cause they don't own
an //s4/6 anymore aether??!!

I just think there are other solutions to the question
at hand..& I suppose Quattrohead has taken care of
some of every ones concerns.

 Ron Not Mit //scar..but I got an //s4 motor..can I
play??!!

--- mike at urq20v.com wrote:

---------------------------------
I think Brett has single handedly caused more useless
bandwidth than all of the f/s posts combined and the
last I checked he is not the admin for this list or
even own an S-car for that matter.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [s-cars] for sale stuff
From: Ron Wainwright <ron_01056 at yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, January 15, 2007 3:06 pm
To: Quattrohead <quattrohead at quattrohead.com>
Cc: s-car-list at audifans.com

Hey Quattrohead...I don't think your suggestion is
reasonable..all though a nice gesture.

I think the administrators of each & every Audifans
list should GTG & see what can be done as to not add
to the amazing BW all these lists generate.

But again...I think if any/all of you have a problem
with the rules than you should bother Dan..I mean he
is the owner of all this help full info!

Ron
90 CQ 2.6l 20vt 600whp stroker project
91 v8q 5spd DTM project
91 200 20v
93 v8q 4.2 "The Green Monster"
93 v8q 4.2 parts for DTM project

90 v8q 3.6 not stock..Urs8 gone but not forgotten :-(

--- Quattrohead <quattrohead at quattrohead.com> wrote:

---------------------------------
   I am sorry,

I don't think anyone who owns an s-car needs to be
ordered around by anad hitler.

If anyone wants to have a separate forum for the
s-cars, let me knowhere or via my email. I can set one
up real quick under my quattroheaddomain.

Eric Phillips wrote:  
On 1/15/07, Ron Wainwright <ron_01056 at yahoo.com>
wrote:  

Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:42:45 -0800From: "Eric
Phillips" <gcmschemist at gmail.com>Subject: Re: [s-cars]
for sale stuff    

Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 05:05:47 -0800 (PST)From: Ron
Wainwright <ron_01056 at yahoo.com>Subject: Re: [s-cars]
for sale stuffListers, I think this subject has been
HASHED out      

WAY    

too many times....I know that one can go both ways    

on    

this. But the fact of the matter is that FS
postsaren't allowed!      

It has been hashed out a few times.  I think ahealthy
dose of liveand let live needs to be inserted, and I
think thereasons I'vearticulated for my disagreement
with this particularrule arereasonable and moderate.  

Zero-tolerance policies are set such that nobody hasto
think.  Rulesare rules and that's it.      

I don't think anybody is yelling at Brett, nor am
Iyelling at you,for that matter.  I figure if we can
havediscussions about non-SAudis, then we can
certainly trade parts.  Maybethat would be
thesolution.  Parts for "trade".      

I offer my 1993.5 UrS late-VIN driver's-side widgetfor
trade.  Youcontact me off-list, and we work out
exactly whatthe trade would be.Let's say we work out
the trade to be I give you thehighly-desireablewidget,
and you give me 375.23 United States Dollars.      

It's not FS, so it's not against the rules, right?    

Everybody's happy, and no spam was actually sent toany
list.      

What say you, boys?      

Eric      

Eric I love your reasoning don't get me wrong...I
aswell have a "widget FS"..said "widget" is the heart
ofany car..& the "widget" runs STRONG & for
$2,200United States Dollars it could be any ones
aswell...but again..FS ads have a place.    

LMAO!  Good one.  

I do think that the marketplace is a wonder
fullresource..but a quick heads up on the list that
wouldneed the part the most wouldn't be bad
either..butagain see rule 1..(so to speak) FS ads
aren't allowedon the lists..only in the marketplace.  

OK, for trade.  Except that only gets around the
letter of the law,and not the spirit.  

I don't think the powers that be have gotten
enoughcredit for what they do! I've been a lister for
round15yrs now & have seen all types of discussion &
thisone is brought up more than a "team door
handle"topic.    

I there's a reason for it.  There are folks like me
who have aninterest in not making any sort of profit,
but in making sure myfriends on the list have first
crack at my stuff.  I think that whathappens is that
there are those folks who don't want to have to
thinkabout what situation is acceptable, and what
isn't.  So a total ban isput in place.  My solution
would be to enforce it selectively, becausethere are
obviously a wide range of opinions on what should and
shouldnot be allowed.  

& as you mentioned I'm not casting a shadow on
you..oranyone..or talking down...or YELLING at
anyone.......but just like anyone of you out there
tell yourkids that there are certain rules that we
need tofollow as a society I think it's a bit of the
potcalling the kettle Black syndrome for us grown
adultsto contradict what we try to teach our
children..    

I tell my kids that rules are sometimes colored in
grey, and not soblack-and-white.  Some rules must
never be broken.  Some rules may bebroken at great
need.  And some rules exist only for the ego of
therulemakers and can be safely ignored**.  As a
parent, I have toinstill proper judgement such that my
kids can tell which rules arewhich, and which ones
might be colored in between the shades I havedrawn in
here.  Even around the house, there are such rules -
like"never, EVER touch Daddy's tools.  If you need a
tool, Daddy witheither get you your own tool, or
fix/install the thing that needsdoing.  Even the wife
knows (now) to obey that rule.  The rule "don'tdrink
Daddy's last soda" is routinely ignored.  :)**(Note: 
the no FS postings list rule is *NOT* an ego-driven
one,IMO.  Let me be PERFECTLY CLEAR on that!)I'm still
pulling for the "for trade, contact me off-list" kind
ofdeal, where widget trades might be initated for, oh,
$327.23 worth ofStarbucks common stock, for instance. 
;)BTW, if I had a CQ, I'd love to trade for your
widget.  I need an S2. 
:)Eric_______________________________________________S-CAR-List
mailing
listS-CAR-List at audifans.comhttp://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list

____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and
previews at Yahoo! Games.
http://videogames.yahoo.com/platform?platform=120121
_______________________________________________
S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list 

____________________________________________________________________________________
TV dinner still cooling? 
Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/