[s-cars] Saw my first A5

[Theodore Chen]

the supercharged mustangs that ford is selling now use a drive that is an integral part of the front cover of the supercharger, so a pulley change requires removal of the supercharger.  the pulley is pressed on, making removal difficult.  i'm sure ford did that on purpose to make it more difficult to modify the cars, and easier to spot tampering, so that people can't increase the boost, blow something up, change back to stock, and make a warranty claim.




----- Original Message ----
From: LL - NY <larrycleung at gmail.com>
To: Theodore Chen <tedebearp at yahoo.com>
Cc: "djdawson2 at aol.com" <djdawson2 at aol.com>; s-car-list at audifans.com
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 12:44:33 PM
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Saw my first A5

Special pulley tool # 20XX only availible from AoNA for competition purposes only....

Probably stocked with all of the NOS parts they keep for restoring the "classics"....




On 7/7/08, Theodore Chen <tedebearp at yahoo.com> wrote:
supercharger
isn't necessarily all bad.  look at the power output mercedes
got with superchargers.  and the most powerful production
corvette ever is showing up with a supercharged engine,
too.  it's rated at 14/20 mpg, which isn't great but is
comparable to the S5, and far better than other supercar offerings from
ferrari, porsche, etc.

question is, will audi be taking steps to make sure the supercharger pulley can't be swapped for a smaller one?


----- Original Message ----
From: LL - NY <larrycleung at gmail.com>
To: "djdawson2 at aol.com" <djdawson2 at aol.com>

Cc: s-car-list at audifans.com
Sent: Monday, July 7, 2008 12:10:15 PM
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Saw my first A5

As Taka pointed out, the plumbing is easier, and the apparent intent is that
it'll nestle between the cylinder banks.  That being said, I'd prefer a
turbo myself, more fuel efficient and more tunable, although I'm willing to
bet that's part of the reason Audi wouldn't want to go that route.

FWIW, the same column said that the RS4 will retain the V8, possibly blown.

LL - NY

On 7/7/08, djdawson2 at aol.com <djdawson2 at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Yep, I have an '01 S4 too... nobody should be able to complain about stock
> configuration throttle response from that engine design.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Kase <davekase at pdqlocks.com>
> To: djdawson2 at aol.com
> Cc: larrycleung at gmail.com; s-car-list at audifans.com
> Sent: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:27 pm
> Subject: Re: [s-cars] Saw my first A5
>
> They have the lag dialed out these days. My '01 S4 has no detectable lag. A
> big difference after driving an S2 for a year.
>
> I concur. A supercharger ain't the way to go.
>
> Kase
>
> djdawson2 at aol.com wrote:
> > Hmm... you'd think they would stick to their core competency.? If there's
> one thing Audi has always done well, it is building good turbo engines.? Why
> not continue that theme?? Superchargers are heat factories... not sure why
> they'd want to go in that direction, unless the market just can't deal with
> a little lag.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: LL - NY <larrycleung at gmail.com>
> > To: djdawson2 at aol.com <djdawson2 at aol.com>
> > Cc: t44tqtro at gmail.com; s-car-list at audifans.com
> > Sent: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:59 am
> > Subject: Re: [s-cars] Saw my first A5
> >
> >
> > Audi is going back to blowers now (the neu-S4 will be a single SC V6) but
> the belt driven kind. > (Autoweek 30 June 2008)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > S-CAR-List mailing list
> > S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> > http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
> >
> ------------------------------
> The Famous, the infamous, the lame - in your browser. Get the TMZ Toolbar

> Now <http://toolbar.aol.com/tmz/download.html?NCID=aolcmp00050000000014>!
>
_______________________________________________

S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list