[s-cars] t-belt and things
derocco_16v at comcast.net
derocco_16v at comcast.net
Wed Jan 21 20:55:30 PST 2009
this is going to be DYI, but not all by myself :) that would be a disaster :))
but I will not be bringing the car to a shop
Martin,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Green" <trgreen at comcast.net>
To: s-car-list at audifans.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 1:31:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [s-cars] t-belt and things
>
I don't want to be disagreeable but, I will disagree here. The timing
belt
change is straight-forward and is only remarkable by the occasional
screw-up -- look for another shop that can remove a seal without
incident.
The original post also said he was going to have the timing belt service
done, which I interpret as not a DIY job, but it is necessary that he
assemble
the parts.
"I've had no problems with timing sensors" places David in the minority
and I would not use the exception to guide my PM decisions. If it is
a DIY
job, changing the CPS with a BBAutoMacao sensor is cheap insurance,
or, conversely, if you always carry your tools and an occasional no-
start
episode is no problem, just wait and do it in the parking lot.
However, if
you must have it towed to the mechanic and then obtain the part and pay
his labor, better change it now even if you have to buy a genuine part.
I have three vehicles, so the decision to keep a spare crank pulley gear
is a no-brainer. Plus, I don't want to get bogged down in the middle
of the
job having to order a part -- and pay a premium because I want it
right away.
I don't automatically use the new part, but I give it a dye-penetrant
crack
inspection before re-use.
You could have also just said "torsen" or "anti-sieze" rather than
ask Mr.
Chips for crack stories. Most weren't around for the last belt
change, so
the circumstances that caused it are mostly guesswork. And, as the sage
once remarked, "if you've seen one crack, you've seen them all". : > )
Tom
> -----Original Messages-----
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:07:39 -0800
> From: "David Giannandrea" <david.giannandrea at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: Re: [s-cars] t-belt and things
> To: <s-car-list at audifans.com>
> Message-ID: <47509F84B7514C43B15732F6478730A2 at HP762n>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> I disagree with 2 items suggested here...
>
> "timing belt tensioner, cam seal, crankshaft seal, camshaft position
> sensor"
>
> I had a shop ruin the oil pump ($400) because they mangled the
> removal of
> the crankshaft seal on my 93 S4 (same 2.2t as yours)...and it wasn't
> leaking
> at 150K. So approach that decision with caution.
>
> I've had no problems with timing sensors and I'm at 210K now.
>
> And I think Theodore meant to add water pump to the list...they're
> cheap
> enough.
>
> David G
>
> Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:18:21 -0800
> From: "David Giannandrea" <david.giannandrea at sbcglobal.net>
> Subject: [s-cars] sheared crankshaft pulley
> To: <s-car-list at audifans.com>
> Message-ID: <B91E07B8C07B449180739F32734F3C43 at HP762n>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> In the thread about t-belt maintenance Robert Myers said he had seen
> two
> sheared pulleys. From what I've read (and experienced with the shop
> that
> ruined the oil pump pulling out the crankshaft seal) the crankshaft
> pulley
> can be ruined if impact tools are used to remove the crankshaft bolt.
>
> Additionally, it seems fragile enough to simply fail during a proper
> removal
> too. When assembled, the pulley is held so tightly with 300ftlbs of
> torqued
> compression, that I doubt it can move.
>
> Robert. Give up your stories on how it happened. We need to know.
>
> David G.
_______________________________________________
S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
More information about the S-CAR-List
mailing list