[s-cars] guilty, not guilty?

[bill mahoney]

Scott et. al.,
Rolling, schmolling.  I learned this fine technique in the great state of CA
a long, long time ago.  They, in fact, were probably the first to come up
with this right on red thing and thus the name "California Stop."  Thank you
California.
Funny how if I watch this video enough times, I can visualize the car to
come to a stop:)  If I could only mind control the judge to see it the same
way.
At any rate, the street from the left was not even a street but entrance to
a small shopping mall from where usually about three cars will exit at a
time and my cursory "coast" was enough to see the coast was clear.
Henceforth I will at least re edumicate myself to stop and go.... and begin
my search for some kinda plate blocker defense technology.
As I read up, I believe this is like a parking ticket / aka revenue
generator and who was driving is not relevant... so they say.
I noted how the camera is aimed only at the right lane as they know that
that's where the revenue will come from and yikes, at $100 a crack they
gotta $5000 a day with the same crime.  If they really wanted people to
stop, they would put a sign on the camera post saying red light camera ahead
or something.  Nope.  This is grand theft, right on red.  They just want the
money honey.
Bill~lovin' the robber barons~M

Ps Scotty,  Will you be beaming out to sfest ?




On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:34 PM, <qshipq at aol.com> wrote:

>
>  Mr Bill
> The right turn camera's use either radar or sensors to detect speed of the
> right turn ('on red')...  See the sensor type here
> http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=306391
> The amount of 'roll' can be adjusted from a complete stop to double digit
> MPH.  The law states complete stop.  Your video defines a rolling stop
> IMestimation.  You can ck the dailyherald on which suburbs are doing what
> with the right turn on red issues.  I suspect until banned, even if you took
> that to court, that video reviewed by a judge would clearly indicate a
> complete stop was not made.
>
> My daughter got caught rolling 2 stops in Chicagoland with these cameras.
> 200cash disappears from the wallet, with nothing but a crappy video...
>
> Cheers
>
> Scott J
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: chris chambers <fastscirocco_2000 at yahoo.com>
> To: bill mahoney <airbil at gmail.com>; s-car-list at audifans.com
> Sent: Thu, Jul 22, 2010 11:06 am
> Subject: Re: [s-cars] guilty, not guilty?
>
>  Bill,
>
>
>
>
> I can't see the light to tell where it's at, assuming they have another way of
>
>
> knowing.
>
>
> Otherwise I guess it depends on what "the man's" definition of stop is.
>
>
>
>
> Personally I think Serge was behind the wheel.
>
>
>
>
> Can they really hold you responsible because you are the owner if they can't
>
>
> prove who was driving?
>
>
>
>
> I despise traffic cams .... glad they aren't here in kazoo land.
>
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> From: bill mahoney <airbil at gmail.com>
>
>
> To: s-car-list at audifans.com
>
>
> Sent: Thu, July 22, 2010 11:03:33 AM
>
>
> Subject: [s-cars] guilty, not guilty?
>
>
>
>
> Moral issues aside, here's a the "mans" video of me in the D2 alleged to
>
>
> have run a red to the tune of a hondo US fiat bucks.
>
>
> Very bizzare feeling to think back to a crime committed two weeks back when
>
>
> I can't remember 10 minutes ago.
>
>
> I'll play it out and claim I stopped, but they can't even say who was
>
>
> driving.
>
>
> Whatcha all say?
>
> http://flic.kr/p/8kDLsT
>
>
> Bill~glad they don't ask for payment in gold~M
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> S-CAR-List mailing list
>
> http://audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>
> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> S-CAR-List mailing list
>
> http://audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>
> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>
>