[s-cars] guilty, not guilty?

[mtgadbois at aol.com]

Bill,

As I recall, Schaumburg received many complaints regarding their ticketing effort.  I believe they removed the cameras when enough people stated that they will never return to Woodfield.  You could start a movement.  BTW, I shop at Oak Brook and Yorktown, rarely, if ever, at Woodfield. 

Mark near Chicago, staying on the west side. 

Scott et. al.,
Rolling, schmolling.  I learned this fine technique in the great state of CA
a long, long time ago.  They, in fact, were probably the first to come up
with this right on red thing and thus the name "California Stop."  Thank you
California.
Funny how if I watch this video enough times, I can visualize the car to
come to a stop:)  If I could only mind control the judge to see it the same
way.
At any rate, the street from the left was not even a street but entrance to
a small shopping mall from where usually about three cars will exit at a
time and my cursory "coast" was enough to see the coast was clear.
Henceforth I will at least re edumicate myself to stop and go.... and begin
my search for some kinda plate blocker defense technology.
As I read up, I believe this is like a parking ticket / aka revenue
generator and who was driving is not relevant... so they say.
I noted how the camera is aimed only at the right lane as they know that
that's where the revenue will come from and yikes, at $100 a crack they
gotta $5000 a day with the same crime.  If they really wanted people to
stop, they would put a sign on the camera post saying red light camera ahead
or something.  Nope.  This is grand theft, right on red.  They just want the
money honey.
Bill~lovin' the robber barons~M

Ps Scotty,  Will you be beaming out to sfest ?