[urq] H&R vs '84 stock springs

[Martin Pajak]

Brandon,

Having experience with both I would go with Eibach..
They make the car sit very nice (level).
H&Rs are a bit low in the front and a bit high in the rear... (with proper
strut bearings).

I also find Eibachs to be a perfect compromise between everyday driving and
performance.

Hope this helps.
Martin Pajak

http://www.quattro.ca

1983 Audi Ur-quattro (295,000 km) Canadian spec.

1985 Audi Ur-quattro (192,000 km) 3B Euro spec. import ;o)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: urq-bounces at audifans.com [mailto:urq-bounces at audifans.com]On
> Behalf Of Brandon Rogers
> Sent: January 7, 2004 11:07
> To: urq at audifans.com
> Subject: [urq] H&R vs '84 stock springs
>
>
> Hey guys-
> Ok....more thoughts happening here.....
>
> A couple Koni vs Bilstein replies got me thinking about springs,
> which I was not intending to replace, but am having second
> thoughts...  I can definitely see how H&R springs could be a nice
> upgrade from stock '83 springs, but what about '84 or '85?
> Because the later cars are already a little lower, and I think a
> bit stiffer (not sure though) I'm wondering how much better H&Rs
> would be.  How much, if any, would they lower an '84 or '85?
> This car will see an occasional track appearance (maybe once a
> year) but mostly just street, including aggressively driven
> mountain roads.
>
> again, TIA-
>
> Brandon
> '84 ur
>
> _______________________________________________
> Audifans urq mailing list
> Send posts to: mailto:urq at audifans.com
> Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
> Have an Audi question?  Look for your answer in the Audifans
> Knowledgebase!
> http://www.audi-quattro.org/kb ... all contributions welcome!
>