[urq] Abt fuel distributor
j.koenig
j.koenig at adelphia.net
Thu Sep 1 11:32:44 EDT 2005
Very well said. Same emissions issues here in MA, but with a twist. '83s are exempt,
'84s are not! Damn. Though I'd have to say that, here at least, in terms of visual
inspection there's often a big difference between what's legal and what one can get away
with.
John
----- Original Message -----
From: "Buchholz, Steven" <Steven.Buchholz at kla-tencor.com>
... never say never ...
I believe there are justifications for keeping CIS ... states like CA have big time
problems approving an aftermarket system without extensive testing. If you can slip a
beefed up Abt FD (it probably even has a CARB number) into a car and know that you are not
going to get beefed by the SmogPROs (TM) there is definite value to that. California is
not the only state that has the Draconian emissions control bureaucracies, and not
everyone is going for peak performance.
More information about the urq
mailing list