[urq] Front/Rear Suspension Updates
Martin Pajak
martin at quattro.ca
Thu Aug 10 16:08:10 EDT 2006
I am talking about the '91 Forged control arms that look like a big V.
Those do have a provision for sway bar attachment, but yes, CQ never used
it as the sway bar on those cars attaches traight onto the strut.
I can send you a pic of Ur-q 20v suspension to clarify.
Part numbers are:
893 407 148D
893 407 147D
Cheers
--
Martin Pajak
http://www.quattro.ca
1982 Audi Ur-quattro (50,000 mi) new project
1983 Audi Ur-quattro (85,000 mi) Concourse d'Elegance
1985 Audi Ur-quattro (212,000 km) Euro spec. import mit 3B :)
1987 Audi 4000s quattro (205,000 km) wintervagen mit 7A :)
> Renneisen, Eric 475
> Martin wrote:
>> It's a bolt on application if you upgrade the swaybar f/r to newer
> style.
>> Newer swaybar is needed to work with newer control arms.
>
> Careful here... The B3 CQ came with two types of suspension setup.
> The early '90 cars had stamped arms and front swaybar like the later
> urq (and no rear bar). The later CQ got cast arms and F/R swaybars
> linked to the strut. So, "newer" swaybar terminology might get
> confusing.
>
> I presume you're talking about using the early CQ stamped arms that
> have a provision for the swaybar link bushing. I *think* the cast arms
> don't have the required hole.
>
> Eric R.
> '86 urq
> '93 S4
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please
> immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email
> transmission may contain confidential information. This information is
> intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is
> intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files
> if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance.
> Copyright 2006 CIGNA
> =============================================================================
More information about the urq
mailing list