[urq] Toyota should be talking to Audi....NAC
Steve Eiche
seiche at shadetreesoftware.com
Fri Feb 26 10:54:13 PST 2010
Mike,
My response wasn't in response to you. In fact, I can't say that I even
read your post before my post - sorry... My point is just that the fact
a car's brakes CAN overcome the engine, many (most?) situations aren't
ones that lend themselves to a full panic stop, which is about the only
way that braking will stop a car with a WOT. The media always goes for
the most sensational, and we naturally point to those examples to say
how poorly some people react to adverse situations. Some people do a
good job of assessing a situation and dealing with it, while others lock
up and kill innocent people. Most cases are probably in between.
Steve
Ingo Rautenberg wrote:
> But c'mon, she SAID she shifted to neutral and even reverse to no
> avail.. And them everything suddenly was ok again after the phone
> call. Funny how the subsequent owners report no problems whatsoever.
> And they let her cry in front of the camera. Drama made for TV. If
> it's on TV, it must be true, right??? Arghhh.
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Mike Sylvester <mike at urq20v.com
> <mailto:mike at urq20v.com>> wrote:
>
> I agree that the panic stop isn't the best way out of the situation.
> My point was that the brakes could stop the car.
> That was my reason behind the moron comment.
> If they had time to make the phone call, they could have shifted into
> neutral.
>
> Mike
>
>
More information about the urq
mailing list