[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help! Dealer woes . . .
- To: quattro@swiss.ans.net
- Subject: Re: Help! Dealer woes . . .
- From: zm@mhcnet.att.com (Zafer Mehmood [209])
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 1994 13:16:05 +0500
- Original-From: mhcnet!zm (Zafer Mehmood [209])
- Original-To: swiss.ans.net!quattro
- Reply-To: quattro
- Sender: quattro-owner
> > not damaged anything. If they had put the belt back on wrong, i.e.,
> > if the timing was off a couple of teeth, then the car wouldn't run the
> > same and you run the danger of having the pistons hit the valves.
>
> I thought Audi's were non-interference -- valves and pistons can't collide,
> even with a broken timing belt. Anyone know for sure?
>
> walter
>
I have been told by my Audi dealer mechanic (a reliable guy) that
they have seen this happen. I think one or two people on this mailing
list have also reported bent valves due to belt breaking, I think
on quattro coupes though, but still the same 2.2 litre 5 cyl engine.
I was also under the impression that these engines were the non-interference
type until I heard of these cases.
Zafer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Zafer Mehmood AT&T Bell Laboratories
zm@mhcnet.att.com Murray Hill, NJ