[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Radar detector/jammers
- To: quattro-owner@swiss.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: Radar detector/jammers
- From: glen.powell@ccmailny.smc.com
- Date: 14 Nov 1994 09:32:34 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Nov 14 09:32:33 1994
- P1-Recipient: quattro-owner@swiss.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Ua-Content-Id: 333209141194
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 14 Nov 1994 09:32:34 -0500action Relayed
Well, just gottah take issue with the statement that "passive jammer are
*totally ineffective*.
Have you ever used or tested one? I have. They are *very effective*. I
also wondered about
the small reflector size, relative to the size of the vehicle. The way it
was explained to me, by
an expert in the area of things RF, the reflector is "tuned", just the
same as an antenna is tuned
for a frequency range, and is therefore *far* more efficient at
reflecting the signal Vs the random
shapes of the vehicle surface. Me? I just know *it works*! The unit I
have is called the _Eclipse_.
It looks and mounts just like a detector and works great in parallel with
a detector.
Vorsprung durch Technik,
-glen
--
Dan Simoes dans@ans.net
Advanced Network & Services (914) 789-5378
100 Clearbrook Road Elmsford, NY 10523